Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590642›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2018

Use of zebrafish to study

Gina M Duggan, Serge Mostowy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Virulomic Analysis of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. An Experimental Adult Zebrafish Model forMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gina M DugganSection of Microbiology, MRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Serge MostowySection of Microbiology, MRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK s.mostowy@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7286-6503
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 206444/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust WT097411MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyDysentery, BacillaryImmunity, CellularInflammasomesShigellaZebrafishInflammasomesAntimicrobial resistanceAutophagyCytoskeletonEmergency granulopoiesisInflammationMacrophageNeutrophilSeptinShigellaZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID29590642
PMCPMC5894947
OpenAlexW2793134184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.