ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Response of Single Cells to Shock Waves and Numerically Optimized Waveforms for Cancer Therapy.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracorporeal shock waves effectively suppress colorectal cancer proliferation and growth.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tumor Biomechanics-Inspired Future Medicine.Cancers · 2024Review
- Advances in modeling cellular mechanical perceptions and responses via the membrane-cytoskeleton-nucleus machinery.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2024Review
- Intravascular lithotripsy: A novel option for severe calcification of coronary artery.Clinical cardiology · 2024Review
- Single-shot optical imaging with spectrum circuit bridging timescales in high-speed photography.Science advances · 2023Article
- Mechanobiological Strategies to Augment Cancer Treatment.ACS omega · 2023Review
- The image-based ultrasonic cell shaking test.PloS one · 2023Article
- Piezo1 Channels as Force Sensors in Mechanical Force-Related Chronic Inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Article
- Mechanically induced integrin ligation mediates intracellular calcium signaling with single pulsating cavitation bubbles.Theranostics · 2021Article
- Onco-Esthetics Dilemma: Is There a Role for Electrocosmetic-Medical Devices?Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Low-energy shock waves evoke intracellular CaScientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Shock waves are used clinically for breaking kidney stones and treating musculoskeletal indications. The mechanisms by which shock waves interact with tissue are still not well understood. Here, ultra-high-speed imaging was used to visualize the deformation of individual cells embedded in a tissue-mimicking phantom when subject to shock-wave exposure from a clinical source. Three kidney epithelial cell lines were considered to represent normal healthy (human renal epithelial), cancer (CAKI-2), and virus-transformed (HK-2) cells. The experimental results showed that during the compressive phase of the shock waves, there was a small (<2%) decrease in the projected cell area, but during the tensile phase, there was a relatively large (∼10%) increase in the projected cell area. The experimental observations were captured by a numerical model with a constitutive material framework consisting of an equation of state for the volumetric response and hyper-viscoelasticity for the deviatoric response. To model the volumetric cell response, it was necessary to change from a higher bulk modulus during the compression to a lower bulk modulus during the tensile shock loading. It was discovered that cancer cells showed a smaller deformation but faster response to the shock-wave tensile phase compared to their noncancerous counterparts. Cell viability experiments, however, showed that cancer cells suffered more damage than other cell types. These data suggest that the cell response to shock waves is specific to the type of cell and waveforms that could be tailored to an application. For example, the model predicts that a shock wave with a tensile stress of 4.59 MPa would increase cell membrane permeability for cancer cells with minimal impact on normal cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.