Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590595›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2018

Entropic Control of Receptor Recycling Using Engineered Ligands.

Andre C M DeGroot, David J Busch, Carl C Hayden, Samuel A Mihelic, Aaron T Alpar, Marcelo Behar, Jeanne C Stachowiak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Steric pressure between glycosylated transmembrane proteins inhibits internalization by endocytosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Advances in PSMA theranostics.Translational oncology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Membrane bending by protein phase separation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andre C M DeGrootDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
David J BuschDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Carl C HaydenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Samuel A MihelicDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Aaron T AlparDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Marcelo BeharDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Jeanne C StachowiakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. Electronic address: jcstach@austin.utexas.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Comprehensive Training Program in Imaging Science and InformaticsT32EB007507 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARKEY, MIA K, RYLANDER, HENRY GRADY · 2009 to 2024
$2.7M
Protein Networks as Synergistic Drivers of Membrane TrafficR01GM112065 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI STACHOWIAK, JEANNE CASSTEVENS · 2014 to 2020
$2.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007507NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptor internalization by endocytosis regulates diverse cellular processes, from the rate of nutrient uptake to the timescale of essential signaling events. The established view is that internalization is tightly controlled by specific protein-binding interactions. However, recent work suggests that physical aspects of receptors influence the process in ways that cannot be explained by biochemistry alone. Specifically, work from several groups suggests that increasing the steric bulk of receptors may inhibit their uptake by multiple types of trafficking vesicles. How do biochemical and biophysical factors work together to control internalization? Here, we show that receptor uptake is well described by a thermodynamic trade-off between receptor-vesicle binding energy and the entropic cost of confining receptors within endocytic vesicles. Specifically, using large ligands to acutely increase the size of engineered variants of the transferrin receptor, we demonstrate that an increase in the steric bulk of a receptor dramatically decreases its probability of uptake by clathrin-coated structures. Further, in agreement with a simple thermodynamic analysis, all data collapse onto a single trend relating fractional occupancy of the endocytic structure to fractional occupancy of the surrounding plasma membrane, independent of receptor size. This fundamental scaling law provides a simple tool for predicting the impact of receptor expression level, steric bulk, and the size of endocytic structures on receptor uptake. More broadly, this work suggests that bulky ligands could be used to drive the accumulation of specific receptors at the plasma membrane surface, providing a biophysical tool for targeted modulation of signaling and metabolism from outside the cell.

Indexed as

EndocytosisEntropyModels, BiologicalProtein EngineeringCell LineHumansKineticsLigandsProtein BindingLigands

Identifiers

PMID29590595
PMCPMC5883623
OpenAlexW2794806286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.