ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2018
Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Exposure to second-hand smoke and breast cancer risk in non-smoking women: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Use of oral contraceptives in BRCA mutation carriers and risk for ovarian and breast cancer: a systematic review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2020Pooled it
- Perception about benefits and risks related to combined hormonal contraceptives use in women with Lynch syndrome.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Effects of Endocrine Interventions Targeting ERα or PR on Breast Cancer Risk in the General Population and Carriers ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Extraterrestrial Gynecology: Could Spaceflight Increase the Risk of Developing Cancer in Female Astronauts? An Updated Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Estrogen receptor-α signaling in post-natal mammary development and breast cancers.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- Bias Analysis Gone Bad.American journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Personalised medicine and population health: breast and ovarian cancer.Human genetics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29590551What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.