Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590480›Full record

ArticleSleep2018

Anatomic predictors of response and mechanism of action of upper airway stimulation therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Richard J Schwab, Stephen H Wang, Johan Verbraecken, Olivier M Vanderveken, Paul Van de Heyning, Wim G Vos, Jan W DeBacker, Brendan T Keenan, Quan Ni, Wilfried DeBacker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea for surgical consultation: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Surgical treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Palate Shape, Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Findings, and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Pharyngeal Surgery Outcomes.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Obstructive sleep apnea.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical Radiographic Predictors of Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard J SchwabUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Stephen H WangUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Johan VerbraeckenAntwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Olivier M VandervekenAntwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Paul Van de HeyningAntwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Wim G VosFluidDA, Kontich, Belgium.
Jan W DeBackerFluidDA, Kontich, Belgium.
Brendan T KeenanUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Quan NiInspire Medical Systems, Maple Grove, MN.
Wilfried DeBackerAntwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Objectives: Upper airway stimulation has been shown to be an effective treatment for some patients with obstructive sleep apnea. However, the mechanism by which hypoglossal nerve stimulation increases upper airway caliber is not clear. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify the mechanism of action of upper airway stimulation. We hypothesized that, with upper airway stimulation, responders would show greater airway opening in the retroglossal (base of the tongue) region, greater hyoid movement toward the mandible, and greater anterior motion in the posterior, inferior region of the tongue compared with nonresponders. Methods: Seven participants with obstructive sleep apnea who had been successfully treated with upper airway stimulation (responders) and six participants who were not successfully treated (nonresponders) underwent computed tomography imaging during wakefulness with and without hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Responders reduced their apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) by 22.63 ± 6.54 events per hour, whereas nonresponders had no change in their AHI (0.17 ± 14.04 events per hour). We examined differences in upper airway caliber, the volume of the upper airway soft tissue structures, craniofacial relationships, and centroid tongue and soft palate movement between responders and nonresponders with and without hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Results: Our data indicate that compared with nonresponders, responders had a smaller baseline soft palate volume and, with stimulation, had (1) a greater increase in retroglossal airway size; (2) increased shortening of the mandible-hyoid distance; and (3) greater anterior displacement of the tongue. Conclusions: These results suggest that smaller soft palate volumes at baseline and greater tongue movement anteriorly with stimulation improve the response to upper airway stimulation.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansHyoid BoneHypoglossal NerveMaleMandibleMiddle AgedMovementPalate, SoftPolysomnographyRespiratory SystemSleep Apnea, ObstructiveTomography, X-Ray ComputedTongueTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29590480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.