Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590262›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2018

PCR-RFLP assay as an option for primary HPV test.

L Golfetto, E V Alves, T R Martins, T C M Sincero, J B S Castro, C Dannebrock, J G Oliveira, J E Levi, A S C Onofre, M L Bazzo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

L GolfettoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular, Microbiologia e Sorologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
E V AlvesLaboratório de Biologia Molecular, Microbiologia e Sorologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
T R MartinsLaboratório de Virologia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
T C M SinceroDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
J B S CastroPosto Central, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Miguel do Oeste, SC, Brasil.
C DannebrockLaboratório Prevent Citopatologia, São Miguel do Oeste, SC, Brasil.
J G OliveiraGrupo de Pesquisa em Imunologia Celular e Molecular, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
J E LeviLaboratório de Virologia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
A S C OnofreDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
M L BazzoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular, Microbiologia e Sorologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRBrazilian Institute of Neuropsychology and Behaviour · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRSecretaria Municipal de Saúde · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is an essential factor of cervical cancer. This study evaluated the analytical performance of restriction fragment length polymorphism polymerase chain reaction (PCR-RFLP) assay compared to PapilloCheck® microarray to identify human papilloma virus (HPV) in cervical cells. Three hundred and twenty-five women were analyzed. One sample was used for conventional cytology and another sample was collected using BD SurePath™ kit for HPV tests. Eighty samples (24.6%) were positive for HPV gene by PCR-Multiplex and were then submitted to PCR-RFLP and PapilloCheck® microarray. There was a genotyping agreement in 71.25% (57/80) on at least one HPV type between PCR-RFLP and PapilloCheck® microarray. In 22 samples (27.5%), the results were discordant and those samples were additionally analyzed by DNA sequencing. HPV 16 was the most prevalent HPV type found in both methods, followed by HPVs 53, 68, 18, 39, and 66 using PCR-RFLP analysis, and HPVs 39, 53, 68, 56, 31, and 66 using PapilloCheck® microarray. In the present study, a perfect agreement using Cohen's kappa (κ) was found in HPV 33 and 58 (κ=1), very good for HPV 51, and good for types 16, 18, 53, 59, 66, 68, 70, and 73. PCR-RFLP analysis identified only 25% (20/80) HPV coinfection, and PapilloCheck® microarray found 62.5% (50/80). Our Cohen's kappa results indicate that our in-house HPV genotyping testing (PCR-RFLP analysis) could be applied as a primary HPV test screening, especially in low income countries. If multiple HPV types are found in this primary test, a more descriptive test, such as PapilloCheck® microarray, could be performed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenotypeHumansMass ScreeningMicroarray AnalysisMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29590262
PMCPMC5886552
OpenAlexW2789990765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.