Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590159›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Motivations of women in Uganda living with rheumatic heart disease: A mixed methods study of experiences in stigma, childbearing, anticoagulation, and contraception.

Andrew Y Chang, Juliet Nabbaale, Haddy Nalubwama, Emmy Okello, Isaac Ssinabulya, Christopher T Longenecker, Allison R Webel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What We Lost in the Fire: Endemic Tropical Heart Diseases in the Time of COVID-19.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. The Global Impact of Rheumatic Heart Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew Y ChangDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3009-6678
Juliet NabbaaleUganda Heart Institute, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Haddy NalubwamaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Emmy OkelloUganda Heart Institute, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Isaac SsinabulyaUganda Heart Institute, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Christopher T LongeneckerUniversity Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Allison R WebelFrances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7538-5780
Mulago Hospital · UGUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USCase Western Reserve University · USMakerere University · UGStanford University · US

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Research and EducationTL1TR001084 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a leading cause of premature mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Women of reproductive age are a unique and vulnerable group of RHD patients, due to increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death during pregnancy. Yet, less than 5% of women of childbearing age with RHD in LMICs use contraceptives, and one in five pregnant women with RHD take warfarin despite known teratogenicity. It is unclear whether this suboptimal contraception and anticoagulant use during pregnancy is due to lack of health system resources, limited health literacy, or social pressure to bear children.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study of 75 women living with RHD in Uganda. Questionnaires were administered to 50 patients. Transcripts from three focus groups with 25 participants were analyzed using qualitative description methodology.

resultsSeveral themes emerged from the focus groups, including pregnancy as a calculated risk; misconceptions about side-effects of contraceptives and anticoagulation; reproductive decision-making control by male partners, in-laws, or physicians; abandonment of patients by male partners; and considerable stigma against heart disease patients for both their reproductive and financial limitations (often worse than that directed against HIV patients). All questionnaire respondents were told by physicians that their hearts were not strong enough to support a pregnancy. Only 14% used contraception while taking warfarin. All participants felt that society would look poorly on a woman who cannot have children due to a heart condition.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study of female RHD patients and their attitudes toward cardiovascular disorders and reproduction. Our results suggest that health programs targeting heart disease in LMICs must pay special attention to the needs of women of childbearing age. There are opportunities for improved family/societal education programs and community engagement, leading to better outcomes and patient empowerment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnticoagulantsContraceptionContraception BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedMotivationRheumatic Heart DiseaseSexual PartnersSocial StigmaSocioeconomic FactorsUgandaAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID29590159
PMCPMC5874006
OpenAlexW2794763762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.