Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590146›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

The impact of pharmacists-led medicines reconciliation on healthcare outcomes in secondary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ejaz Cheema, Farah Kais Alhomoud, Amnah Shams Al-Deen Kinsara, Jomanah Alsiddik, Marwah Hassan Barnawi, Morooj Abdullah Al-Muwallad, Shatha Abdulbaset Abed, Mahmoud E Elrggal, Mahmoud M A Mohamed

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Effect of medication reconciliation interventions on outcomes: A systematic overview of systematic reviews.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Safe Staffing Standards for Pharmacy Technicians in Hospital Settings.Journal of market access & health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ejaz CheemaDepartment of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8538-7392
Farah Kais AlhomoudDepartment of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, School of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Amnah Shams Al-Deen KinsaraDepartment of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Jomanah AlsiddikDepartment of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Marwah Hassan BarnawiDepartment of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Morooj Abdullah Al-MuwalladDepartment of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Shatha Abdulbaset AbedDepartment of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud E ElrggalDepartment of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud M A MohamedDepartment of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Umm al-Qura University · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse drug events (ADEs) impose a major clinical and cost burden on acute hospital services. It has been reported that medicines reconciliation provided by pharmacists is effective in minimizing the chances of hospital admissions related to adverse drug events.

objectiveTo update the previous assessment of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation by restricting the review to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only.

methodsSix major online databases were sifted up to 30 December 2016, without inception date (Embase, Medline Ovid, PubMed, BioMed Central, Web of Science and Scopus) to assess the effect of pharmacist-led interventions on medication discrepancies, preventable adverse drug events, potential adverse drug events and healthcare utilization. The Cochrane tool was applied to evaluate the chances of bias. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model.

resultsFrom 720 articles identified on initial searching, 18 RCTs (6,038 patients) were included. The quality of the included studies was variable. Pharmacists-led interventions led to an important decrease in favour of the intervention group, with a pooled risk ratio of 42% RR 0.58 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.67) P<0.00001 in medication discrepancy. Reductions in healthcare utilization by 22% RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.00) P = 0.05, potential ADEs by10% RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.03) P = 0.65 and preventable ADEs by 27% RR 0.73 (0.22 to 2.40) P = 0.60 were not considerable.

conclusionPharmacists-led interventions were effective in reducing medication discrepancies. However, these interventions did not lead to a significant reduction in potential and preventable ADEs and healthcare utilization.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePharmacistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecondary Health CareHumansMedication Reconciliation

Identifiers

PMID29590146
PMCPMC5873985
OpenAlexW2794829730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.