Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590143›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Short term evaluation of respiratory effort by premature infants supported with bubble nasal continuous airway pressure using Seattle-PAP and a standard bubble device.

Stephen E Welty, Craig G Rusin, Larissa I Stanberry, George T Mandy, Alfred L Gest, Jeremy M Ford, Carl H Backes, C Peter Richardson, Christopher R Howard, Thomas N Hansen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. A trial comparing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen E WeltyDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Washington College of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Craig G RusinDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Larissa I StanberryCenter for Developmental Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
George T MandyDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Alfred L GestDepartment of Pediatrics West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America.
Jeremy M FordCenter for Developmental Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Carl H BackesDepartment of Pediatrics and Center for Perinatal Research, the Ohio State University College of Medicine and School of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
C Peter RichardsonCenter for Developmental Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Christopher R HowardCenter for Developmental Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Thomas N HansenCenter for Developmental Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Charles V SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Washington College of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4759-9623
Seattle Children's Hospital · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Washington · USThe Ohio State University · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlmost one million prematurely born infants die annually from respiratory insufficiency, predominantly in countries with limited access to respiratory support for neonates. The primary hypothesis tested in the present study was that a modified device for bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (Bn-CPAP) would provide lower work of spontaneous breathing, estimated by esophageal pressure-rate products.

methodsInfants born <32 weeks gestation and stable on Bn-CPAP with FiO2 <0.30 were studied within 72 h following delivery. Esophageal pressures during spontaneous breathing were measured during 2 h on standard Bn-CPAP, then 2 h with Bn-CPAP using a modified bubble device presently termed Seattle-PAP, which produces a different pattern of pressure fluctuations and which provided greater respiratory support in preclinical studies, then 2 h on standard Bn-CPAP.

resultsAll 40 infants enrolled completed the study and follow-up through 36 wks post menstrual age or hospital discharge, whichever came first. No infants were on supplemental oxygen at completion of follow-up. No infants developed pneumothoraces or nasal trauma, and no adverse events attributed to the study were observed. Pressure-rate products on the two devices were not different, but effort of breathing, assessed by areas under esophageal pressure-time curves, was lower with Seattle-PAP than with standard Bn-CPAP.

conclusionUse of Seattle-PAP to implement Bn-CPAP lowers the effort of breathing exerted even by relatively healthy spontaneously breathing premature neonates. Whether the lower effort of breathing observed with Seattle-PAP translates to improvements in neonatal mortality or morbidity will need to be determined by studies in appropriate patient populations.

Indexed as

RespirationAmpicillinAnalysis of VarianceAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveContinuous Positive Airway PressureEsophagusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGentamicinsHeart RateHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLinear ModelsAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicins

Identifiers

PMID29590143
PMCPMC5874011
OpenAlexW2795343916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.