Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590118›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Association between periconceptional weight loss and maternal and neonatal outcomes in obese infertile women.

Anne M van Oers, Meike A Q Mutsaerts, Jan M Burggraaff, Walter K H Kuchenbecker, Denise A M Perquin, Carolien A M Koks, Ron van Golde, Eugenie M Kaaijk, Frank J Broekmans, Jan Peter de Bruin and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for obese women with subfertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021 · on this map
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne M van OersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5137-8714
Meike A Q MutsaertsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan M BurggraaffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Scheper Hospital, Emmen, The Netherlands.
Walter K H KuchenbeckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Denise A M PerquinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Carolien A M KoksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Ron van GoldeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Eugenie M KaaijkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank J BroekmansDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Division Female and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan Peter de BruinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Fulco van der VeenCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annemiek W NapDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Ed T C M GondrieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zuyderland MC, Sittard, The Netherlands.
Ben W J MolSchool of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Henk GroenDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Annemieke HoekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
LIFEstyle study group
University Medical Center Groningen · NLIsala · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLOLVG · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLThe University of Adelaide · AUTreant Zorggroep · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUtrecht University · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity in women of reproductive age has deleterious effects on reproductive and offspring health. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between the magnitude of periconceptional body-mass index (BMI) change and maternal and neonatal outcomes in obese infertile women who participated in the LIFEstyle study. The LIFEstyle study was a randomized controlled trial, evaluating if a six-month lifestyle intervention program prior to infertility treatment in obese infertile women improved birth rates, compared to prompt infertility treatment. METHODS AND

findingsThis is an exploratory post hoc analysis of the LIFEstyle study. We recorded periconceptional BMI change in women with an ongoing pregnancy, pooling data of all women, regardless of randomization arm. Periconceptional BMI change was calculated using weight at randomization and the periconceptional weight (measured in kilograms 12 weeks before or after conception and expressed as BMI change in units BMI (kg/m2)). Subsequently, women were categorized into quartiles according to the magnitude of their periconceptional change in BMI. The odds of maternal and neonatal outcomes were calculated using logistic regression analysis, comparing women in each of the first three weight change quartiles separately, and combined, to women in the fourth quartile. The fourth quartile was chosen as reference group, since these women had the least weight loss. We adjusted for periconceptional BMI, nulliparity and smoking status. In addition, we performed a subgroup analysis for singleton pregnancies. In the LIFEstyle study, 321 obese infertile women achieved an ongoing pregnancy which was conceived within 24 months after randomization. Periconceptional BMI change was available in 244 of these women (76%). Median BMI at randomization was 35.9 kg/m2. Women in the first quartile (Q1) had a periconceptional BMI change of <-2.1 kg/m2, women in the second quartile (Q2) -2.1 to -0.9 kg/m2, women in the third quartile (Q3) -0.9 to 0.1 kg/m2 and women in the fourth quartile (Q4) gained ≥0.1 kg/m2. There were no significant differences between women in the quartiles regarding rates of excessive gestational weight gain (in term pregnancies), gestational diabetes, preterm birth, induction of labor, spontaneous vaginal birth and Caesarean section. Compared to women in Q4, the adjusted odds ratios, aOR, and 95% confidence interval for a hypertensive complication were; 0.55 (0.22-1.42) for women in Q1, 0.30 (0.12-0.78) for women in Q2, 0.39 (0.16-0.96) for women in Q3 and 0.39 (0.19-0.82) for women in Q1 to Q3 combined. In the subgroup analysis, investigating singleton pregnancies only, the statistically significant decreased rate of a hypertensive complication remained in women in Q2 (aOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.72) and Q3 (aOR 0.39, 95%CI 0.16-0.98) and when comparing women in Q1 to Q3 together to women in Q4 (aOR 0.38, 95%CI 0.18-0.80). Furthermore, there was a significantly decreased aOR (95%CI) of preterm birth in women in Q2 (0.24, 0.06-0.98) and when combining women in Q1 to Q3 (0.37, 0.14-0.97) compared to women in Q4.

conclusionsThese results suggest that a periconceptional decrease in BMI in obese infertile women could lead to a decrease of the rates of hypertensive pregnancy complications and preterm birth. The results are limited by the exploratory nature of the analyses and further evidence is necessary to provide more definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

Life StyleAdultBirth RateBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfertility, FemaleLive BirthObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateTreatment OutcomeWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID29590118
PMCPMC5873932
OpenAlexW2794471229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.