Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590103›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

Preferential retention of genes from one parental genome after polyploidy illustrates the nature and scope of the genomic conflicts induced by hybridization.

Marianne Emery, M Madeline S Willis, Yue Hao, Kerrie Barry, Khouanchy Oakgrove, Yi Peng, Jeremy Schmutz, Eric Lyons, J Chris Pires, Patrick P Edger and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary diversification of theFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. POInTBMC bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marianne EmeryDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
M Madeline S WillisDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Yue HaoBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5065-8906
Kerrie BarryDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, United States of America.
Khouanchy OakgroveDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, United States of America.
Yi PengDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, United States of America.
Jeremy SchmutzDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8062-9172
Eric LyonsSchool of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
J Chris PiresDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Patrick P EdgerDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Gavin C ConantBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8677-4933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyploidy is increasingly seen as a driver of both evolutionary innovation and ecological success. One source of polyploid organisms' successes may be their origins in the merging and mixing of genomes from two different species (e.g., allopolyploidy). Using POInT (the Polyploid Orthology Inference Tool), we model the resolution of three allopolyploidy events, one from the bakers' yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), one from the thale cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) and one from grasses including Sorghum bicolor. Analyzing a total of 21 genomes, we assign to every gene a probability for having come from each parental subgenome (i.e., derived from the diploid progenitor species), yielding orthologous segments across all genomes. Our model detects statistically robust evidence for the existence of biased fractionation in all three lineages, whereby genes from one of the two subgenomes were more likely to be lost than those from the other subgenome. We further find that a driver of this pattern of biased losses is the co-retention of genes from the same parental genome that share functional interactions. The pattern of biased fractionation after the Arabidopsis and grass allopolyploid events was surprisingly constant in time, with the same parental genome favored throughout the lineages' history. In strong contrast, the yeast allopolyploid event shows evidence of biased fractionation only immediately after the event, with balanced gene losses more recently. The rapid loss of functionally associated genes from a single subgenome is difficult to reconcile with the action of genetic drift and suggests that selection may favor the removal of specific duplicates. Coupled to the evidence for continuing, functionally-associated biased fractionation after the A. thaliana At-α event, we suggest that, after allopolyploidy, there are functional conflicts between interacting genes encoded in different subgenomes that are ultimately resolved through preferential duplicate loss.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenomic ImprintingHybridization, GeneticPolyploidyBrassicaceaeEvolution, MolecularModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID29590103
PMCPMC5891031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.