ReviewAnnual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)2018
3D Printed Organ Models for Surgical Applications.
Review in Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Usage of the adaptive quasi-linear viscoelastic model to predict load-unload, stress-relaxation, and sine load of porcine liver.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- The promising applications of 3D printing technology for diagnosis and therapy of cancer: Recent advances and challenges.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Review
- Synthetic and Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts: Current Status, Emerging Technologies, and Clinical Prospects.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- 3D printed anisotropic tissue simulants with embedded fluid capsules for medical simulation and training.Science advances · 2025Article
- Advancements in 3D printing technologies for personalized treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- 3D-Printed Artificial Organ Models for Surgical Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Emerging applications and research trends of 3D printing and bioprinting in thoracic surgery: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Pilot Evaluation of Silicone Surrogates for Oral Mucosa Simulation in Craniofacial Surgical Training.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimization of Fast Non-Local Means Noise Reduction Algorithm Parameter in Computed Tomographic Phantom Images Using 3D Printing Technology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Revolutionising Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Robotic Innovations in Breast Surgery and Reconstruction.Cureus · 2024Review
- Just the gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report of medical modeling of a rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.SAGE open medical case reports · 2024Article
- Advanced Strategies for the Fabrication of Multi-Material Anatomical Models of Complex Pediatric Oncologic Cases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development of Biocompatible 3D-Printed Artificial Blood Vessels through Multidimensional Approaches.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Advances in pelvic imaging parameters predicting surgical difficulty in rectal cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Review
- Development and evaluation of a portable and soft 3D-printed cast for laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy model in surgical training.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- 3D-Printed multi-material liver model with simultaneous mechanical and radiological tissue-mimicking features for improved realism.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Article
- A MinireviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical errors are a major concern in clinical practice, suggesting the need for advanced surgical aids for preoperative planning and rehearsal. Conventionally, CT and MRI scans, as well as 3D visualization techniques, have been utilized as the primary tools for surgical planning. While effective, it would be useful if additional aids could be developed and utilized in particularly complex procedures involving unusual anatomical abnormalities that could benefit from tangible objects providing spatial sense, anatomical accuracy, and tactile feedback. Recent advancements in 3D printing technologies have facilitated the creation of patient-specific organ models with the purpose of providing an effective solution for preoperative planning, rehearsal, and spatiotemporal mapping. Here, we review the state-of-the-art in 3D printed, patient-specific organ models with an emphasis on 3D printing material systems, integrated functionalities, and their corresponding surgical applications and implications. Prior limitations, current progress, and future perspectives in this important area are also broadly discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.