Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29589956›Full record

ArticleJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2018

Associations of Early Treatments for Low-Back Pain with Military Readiness Outcomes.

Mary Jo Larson, Rachel Sayko Adams, Grant A Ritter, Andrea Linton, Thomas V Williams, Mayada Saadoun, Mark R Bauer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Jo Larson1 The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Rachel Sayko Adams1 The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Grant A Ritter1 The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Andrea Linton2 AXIOM Resource Management, Inc. , Falls Church, Virginia.
Thomas V Williams3 National Opinion Research Center , Bethesda, Maryland.
Mayada Saadoun1 The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Mark R Bauer1 The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Brandeis University · USCapital Meeting Planning · USNational Opinion Research Center · US

Funding

Trajectories of non-pharmacologic and opioid health services for pain management in association with military readiness and health status outcomes: SUPIC renewalR01AT008404 · NCCIH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI ADAMS, RACHEL SAYKO, LARSON, MARY JO · 2014 to 2023
$7.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic low-back pain (LBP) is a frequent cause of work absence and disability, and is frequently associated with long-term use of opioids.

objectiveTo describe military readiness-related outcomes at follow-up in soldiers with LBP grouped by the type of early treatment received for their LBP. Treatment groups were based on receipt of opioid or tramadol prescription and receipt of nonpharmacologic treatment modalities (NPT). Design, Subjects, Measures: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of U.S. soldiers with new LBP episodes persisting more than 90 days between October 2012 and September 2014. Early treatment groups were constructed based on utilization of services within 30 days of the first LBP claim. Outcomes were measured 91-365 days after the first LBP claim. Outcomes were constructed to measure five indicators of limitations of military readiness: military duty limitations, pain-related hospitalization, emergency room visit for LBP, pain score of moderate/severe, and prescription for opioid/tramadol.

resultsAmong soldiers with no opioid receipt in the prior 90 days, there were 30,612 new episodes of LBP, which persisted more than 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression models found that compared to the reference group (no NPT, no opioids/tramadol receipt), soldiers who received early NPT-only had lower likelihoods for military duty limitations, pain-related hospitalization, and opioid/tramadol prescription at follow-up, while soldiers' that started with opioid receipt (at alone or follow-up in conjunction with NPT) exhibited higher likelihoods on many of these negative outcomes.

conclusionThis observational study of soldiers with a new episode of LBP and no opioid receipt in the prior 90 days suggests that early receipt of NPT may be associated with small, significant gains in ability to function as a soldier and reduced reliance on opioid/tramadol medication. While further research is warranted, increased access to NPT at the beginning of LBP episodes should be considered.

Indexed as

Low Back PainAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansIntegrative MedicineMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnalgesics, Opioidcomplementary servicesintegrative healthcarelow-back painmilitaryopioids

Identifiers

PMID29589956
PMCPMC6065526
OpenAlexW2795347140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.