Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29589897›Full record

ReviewAccounts of chemical research2018

Magnetic Nanotweezers for Interrogating Biological Processes in Space and Time.

Ji-Wook Kim, Hee-Kyung Jeong, Kaden M Southard, Young-Wook Jun, Jinwoo Cheon

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Accounts of chemical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Magnetic DNA Origami Nanorotors.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Microfabrication Technologies for Nanoinvasive and High-Resolution Magnetic Neuromodulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Programmable ROS-Mediated Cancer Therapy via Magneto-Inductions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ji-Wook KimCenter for NanoMedicine , Institute for Basic Science (IBS) , Seoul 03722 , Republic of Korea.
Hee-Kyung JeongCenter for NanoMedicine , Institute for Basic Science (IBS) , Seoul 03722 , Republic of Korea.
Kaden M SouthardDepartment of Otolaryngology , University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , California 94115 , United States.
Young-Wook JunCenter for NanoMedicine , Institute for Basic Science (IBS) , Seoul 03722 , Republic of Korea.
Jinwoo CheonCenter for NanoMedicine , Institute for Basic Science (IBS) , Seoul 03722 , Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8948-5929
Yonsei University · KRUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Spatiotemporal Control of Dynamic Notch Signaling with Subcellular ResolutionR01GM112081 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JUN, YOUNG-WOOK · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
Nanomodules for interrogating chemical, spatial, and mechanical dynamics of cell surface receptorsR01GM126542 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JUN, YOUNG-WOOK · 2017 to 2019
$951k
Interrogation of mechanotransduction ion channels via nanoruler force microscopy and mechanogenetic nanomodulesR21NS103240 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JUN, YOUNG-WOOK · 2017 to 2018
$436k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112081NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126542NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS103240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to sense and manipulate the state of biological systems has been extensively advanced during the past decade with the help of recent developments in physical tools. Unlike standard genetic and pharmacological perturbation techniques-knockdown, overexpression, small molecule inhibition-that provide a basic on/off switching capability, these physical tools provide the capacity to control the spatial, temporal, and mechanical properties of the biological targets. Among the various physical cues, magnetism offers distinct advantages over light or electricity. Magnetic fields freely penetrate biological tissues and are already used for clinical applications. As one of the unique features, magnetic fields can be transformed into mechanical stimuli which can serve as a cue in regulating biological processes. However, their biological applications have been limited due to a lack of high-performance magnetism-to-mechanical force transducers with advanced spatiotemporal capabilities. In this Account, we present recent developments in magnetic nanotweezers (MNTs) as a useful tool for interrogating the spatiotemporal control of cells in living tissue. MNTs are composed of force-generating magnetic nanoparticles and field generators. Through proper design and the integration of individual components, MNTs deliver controlled mechanical stimulation to targeted biomolecules at any desired space and time. We first discuss about MNT configuration with different force-stimulation modes. By modulating geometry of the magnetic field generator, MNTs exert pulling, dipole-dipole attraction, and rotational forces to the target specifically and quantitatively. We discuss the key physical parameters determining force magnitude, which include magnetic field strength, magnetic field gradient, magnetic moment of the magnetic particle, as well as distance between the field generator and the particle. MNTs also can be used over a wide range of biological time scales. By simply adjusting the amplitude and phase of the applied current, MNTs based on electromagnets allow for dynamic control of the magnetic field from microseconds to hours. Chemical design and the nanoscale effects of magnetic particles are also essential for optimizing MNT performance. We discuss key strategies to develop magnetic nanoparticles with improved force-generation capabilities with a particular focus on the effects of size, shape, and composition of the nanoparticles. We then introduce various strategies and design considerations for target-specific biomechanical stimulations with MNTs. One-to-one particle-receptor engagement for delivering a defined force to the targeted receptor and the small size of the nanoparticles are important. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of MNTs for manipulating biological functions and activities with various spatial (single molecule/cell to organisms) and temporal resolution (microseconds to days). MNTs have the potential to be utilized in many exciting applications across diverse biological systems spanning from fundamental biology investigations of spatial and mechanical signaling dynamics at the single-cell and systems levels to in vivo therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

Optical TweezersAnimalsHumansMagnetite NanoparticlesSpatio-Temporal AnalysisStress, MechanicalTime FactorsMagnetite Nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID29589897
PMCPMC5917604
OpenAlexW2794525033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.