Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29589813›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Proximal and distal modulation of neural activity by spatially confined optogenetic activation with an integrated high-density optoelectrode.

Sarah Libbrecht, Luis Hoffman, Marleen Welkenhuysen, Chris Van den Haute, Veerle Baekelandt, Dries Braeken, Sebastian Haesler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. HectoSTAR μLED Optoelectrodes for Large-Scale, High-Precision In Vivo Opto-Electrophysiology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  7. Flexible optoelectric neural interfaces.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dynamic Impairment of Olfactory Behavior and Signaling Mediated by an Olfactory Corticofugal System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah LibbrechtLaboratory for Neurobiology and Gene Therapy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium.
Luis HoffmanLife Science Technologies and Imaging Department, Imec, Leuven , Belgium.
Marleen WelkenhuysenLife Science Technologies and Imaging Department, Imec, Leuven , Belgium.
Chris Van den HauteLaboratory for Neurobiology and Gene Therapy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium.
Veerle BaekelandtLaboratory for Neurobiology and Gene Therapy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium.
Dries BraekenLife Science Technologies and Imaging Department, Imec, Leuven , Belgium.
Sebastian HaeslerResearch Group Neurophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetic manipulations are widely used for investigating the contribution of genetically identified cell types to behavior. Simultaneous electrophysiological recordings are less common, although they are critical for characterizing the specific impact of optogenetic manipulations on neural circuits in vivo. This is at least in part because combining photostimulation with large-scale electrophysiological recordings remains technically challenging, which also poses a limitation for performing extracellular identification experiments. Currently available interfaces that guide light of the appropriate wavelength into the brain combined with an electrophysiological modality suffer from various drawbacks such as a bulky size, low spatial resolution, heat dissipation, or photovoltaic artifacts. To address these challenges, we have designed and fabricated an integrated ultrathin neural interface with 12 optical outputs and 24 electrodes. We used the device to measure the effect of localized stimulation in the anterior olfactory cortex, a paleocortical structure involved in olfactory processing. Our experiments in adult mice demonstrate that because of its small dimensions, our novel tool causes far less tissue damage than commercially available devices. Moreover, optical stimulation and recording can be performed simultaneously, with no measurable electrical artifact during optical stimulation. Importantly, optical stimulation can be confined to small volumes with approximately single-cortical layer thickness. Finally, we find that even highly localized optical stimulation causes inhibition at more distant sites. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this study, we establish a novel tool for simultaneous extracellular recording and optogenetic photostimulation. Because the device is built using established microchip technology, it can be fabricated with high reproducibility and reliability. We further show that even very localized stimulation affects neural firing far beyond the stimulation site. This demonstrates the difficulty in predicting circuit-level effects of optogenetic manipulations and highlights the importance of closely monitoring neural activity in optogenetic experiments.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesEvoked PotentialsAnimalsElectrodesFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsOptogeneticsSensorimotor Cortexgrating coupleroptogeneticsoptoprobesilicon photonicswaveguide

Identifiers

PMID29589813
PMCPMC6093952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.