ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018
Proximal and distal modulation of neural activity by spatially confined optogenetic activation with an integrated high-density optoelectrode.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implantable silicon neural probes with nanophotonic phased arrays for single-lobe beam steering.Communications engineering · 2024Article
- Implantable photonic neural probes with out-of-plane focusing grating emitters.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Wireless closed-loop deep brain stimulation using microelectrode array probes.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2024Review
- Neurophotonics: a comprehensive review, current challenges and future trends.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Implantable photonic neural probes with 3D-printed microfluidics and applications to uncaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- HectoSTAR μLED Optoelectrodes for Large-Scale, High-Precision In Vivo Opto-Electrophysiology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Flexible optoelectric neural interfaces.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2021Review
- Implantable photonic neural probes for light-sheet fluorescence brain imaging.Neurophotonics · 2021Article
- Small footprint optoelectrodes using ring resonators for passive light localization.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2021Article
- Technological Challenges in the Development of Optogenetic Closed-Loop Therapy Approaches in Epilepsy and Related Network Disorders of the Brain.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Dynamic Impairment of Olfactory Behavior and Signaling Mediated by an Olfactory Corticofugal System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Parylene photonics: a flexible, broadband optical waveguide platform with integrated micromirrors for biointerfaces.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020Article
- Infrared neural stimulation and inhibition using an implantable silicon photonic microdevice.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020Article
- Visible-light silicon nitride waveguide devices and implantable neurophotonic probes on thinned 200 mm silicon wafers.Optics express · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optogenetic manipulations are widely used for investigating the contribution of genetically identified cell types to behavior. Simultaneous electrophysiological recordings are less common, although they are critical for characterizing the specific impact of optogenetic manipulations on neural circuits in vivo. This is at least in part because combining photostimulation with large-scale electrophysiological recordings remains technically challenging, which also poses a limitation for performing extracellular identification experiments. Currently available interfaces that guide light of the appropriate wavelength into the brain combined with an electrophysiological modality suffer from various drawbacks such as a bulky size, low spatial resolution, heat dissipation, or photovoltaic artifacts. To address these challenges, we have designed and fabricated an integrated ultrathin neural interface with 12 optical outputs and 24 electrodes. We used the device to measure the effect of localized stimulation in the anterior olfactory cortex, a paleocortical structure involved in olfactory processing. Our experiments in adult mice demonstrate that because of its small dimensions, our novel tool causes far less tissue damage than commercially available devices. Moreover, optical stimulation and recording can be performed simultaneously, with no measurable electrical artifact during optical stimulation. Importantly, optical stimulation can be confined to small volumes with approximately single-cortical layer thickness. Finally, we find that even highly localized optical stimulation causes inhibition at more distant sites. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this study, we establish a novel tool for simultaneous extracellular recording and optogenetic photostimulation. Because the device is built using established microchip technology, it can be fabricated with high reproducibility and reliability. We further show that even very localized stimulation affects neural firing far beyond the stimulation site. This demonstrates the difficulty in predicting circuit-level effects of optogenetic manipulations and highlights the importance of closely monitoring neural activity in optogenetic experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.