Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29589592›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018

Developing a hippocampal neural prosthetic to facilitate human memory encoding and recall.

Robert E Hampson, Dong Song, Brian S Robinson, Dustin Fetterhoff, Alexander S Dakos, Brent M Roeder, Xiwei She, Robert T Wicks, Mark R Witcher, Daniel E Couture and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 220 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neurosurgery and the Brain-Computer Interface.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert E HampsonWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Dong Song
Brian S Robinson
Dustin Fetterhoff
Alexander S Dakos
Brent M Roeder
Xiwei She
Robert T Wicks
Mark R Witcher
Daniel E Couture
Adrian W Laxton
Heidi Munger-Clary
Gautam Popli
Myriam J Sollman
Christopher T Whitlow
Vasilis Z Marmarelis
Theodore W Berger
Sam A Deadwyler
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

TrainingP41EB001978 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KHOO, MICHAEL C K · 2003 to 2017
$18.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB001978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe demonstrate here the first successful implementation in humans of a proof-of-concept system for restoring and improving memory function via facilitation of memory encoding using the patient's own hippocampal spatiotemporal neural codes for memory. Memory in humans is subject to disruption by drugs, disease and brain injury, yet previous attempts to restore or rescue memory function in humans typically involved only nonspecific, modulation of brain areas and neural systems related to memory retrieval. APPROACH: We have constructed a model of processes by which the hippocampus encodes memory items via spatiotemporal firing of neural ensembles that underlie the successful encoding of short-term memory. A nonlinear multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) model of hippocampal CA3 and CA1 neural firing is computed that predicts activation patterns of CA1 neurons during the encoding (sample) phase of a delayed match-to-sample (DMS) human short-term memory task. MAIN

resultsMIMO model-derived electrical stimulation delivered to the same CA1 locations during the sample phase of DMS trials facilitated short-term/working memory by 37% during the task. Longer term memory retention was also tested in the same human subjects with a delayed recognition (DR) task that utilized images from the DMS task, along with images that were not from the task. Across the subjects, the stimulated trials exhibited significant improvement (35%) in both short-term and long-term retention of visual information. SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate the facilitation of memory encoding which is an important feature for the construction of an implantable neural prosthetic to improve human memory.

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedNeural ProsthesesHippocampusHumansMemory, Short-TermMental RecallPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID29589592
PMCPMC6576290
OpenAlexW2795210532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.