Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29589451›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2018

Reliable Strategy for Analysis of Complex Biosensor Data.

Patrik Forssén, Evgen Multia, Jörgen Samuelsson, Marie Andersson, Teodor Aastrup, Samuel Altun, Daniel Wallinder, Linus Wallbing, Thanaporn Liangsupree, Marja-Liisa Riekkola and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Patrik ForssénDepartment of Engineering and Chemical Sciences , Karlstad University , SE-651 88 Karlstad , Sweden.
Evgen MultiaDepartment of Chemistry , P.O. Box 55, FI-00014 University of Helsinki , Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8717-8842
Jörgen SamuelssonDepartment of Engineering and Chemical Sciences , Karlstad University , SE-651 88 Karlstad , Sweden.
Marie AnderssonDepartment of Engineering and Chemical Sciences , Karlstad University , SE-651 88 Karlstad , Sweden.
Teodor AastrupAttana AB , Björnäsvägen 21 , SE-114 19 Stockholm , Sweden.
Samuel AltunAttana AB , Björnäsvägen 21 , SE-114 19 Stockholm , Sweden.
Daniel WallinderAttana AB , Björnäsvägen 21 , SE-114 19 Stockholm , Sweden.
Linus WallbingAttana AB , Björnäsvägen 21 , SE-114 19 Stockholm , Sweden.
Thanaporn LiangsupreeDepartment of Chemistry , P.O. Box 55, FI-00014 University of Helsinki , Finland.
Marja-Liisa RiekkolaDepartment of Chemistry , P.O. Box 55, FI-00014 University of Helsinki , Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7519-9892
Torgny FornstedtDepartment of Engineering and Chemical Sciences , Karlstad University , SE-651 88 Karlstad , Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When using biosensors, analyte biomolecules of several different concentrations are percolated over a chip with immobilized ligand molecules that form complexes with analytes. However, in many cases of biological interest, e.g., in antibody interactions, complex formation steady-state is not reached. The data measured are so-called sensorgram, one for each analyte concentration, with total complex concentration vs time. Here we present a new four-step strategy for more reliable processing of this complex kinetic binding data and compare it with the standard global fitting procedure. In our strategy, we first calculate a dissociation graph to reveal if there are any heterogeneous interactions. Thereafter, a new numerical algorithm, AIDA, is used to get the number of different complex formation reactions for each analyte concentration level. This information is then used to estimate the corresponding complex formation rate constants by fitting to the measured sensorgram one by one. Finally, all estimated rate constants are plotted and clustered, where each cluster represents a complex formation. Synthetic and experimental data obtained from three different QCM biosensor experimental systems having fast (close to steady-state), moderate, and slow kinetics (far from steady-state) were evaluated using the four-step strategy and standard global fitting. The new strategy allowed us to more reliably estimate the number of different complex formations, especially for cases of complex and slow dissociation kinetics. Moreover, the new strategy proved to be more robust as it enables one to handle system drift, i.e., data from biosensor chips that deteriorate over time.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiosensing TechniquesQuartz Crystal Microbalance TechniquesKinetics

Identifiers

PMID29589451
PMCPMC6150654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.