Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29589257›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2018

To protect or not to protect: examining reasons for sun protection among young women at risk for skin cancer.

M V Auerbach, C J Heckman, S Darlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M V AuerbachCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9878-4602
C J HeckmanCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA. Carolyn.heckman@fccc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1016-3965
S DarlowCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CHARNITA M. ZEIGLER-JOHNSON · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009035 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CHERNOFF, JONATHAN · 1985 to 2020
$10.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to further the understanding of the low rates of sun protection in young women at risk for skin cancer. Six-hundred-sixty-one daily diary entries were received via text message over 14 days from 56 young women at moderate to high risk of developing skin cancer. Women reported whether or not they used sun protection and also listed what their reasons were for using protection or not using sun protection each day. Multi-level modeling was used to examine the influence of study variables when predicting daily sun protection or lack of protection. The number of days in which sun protection was reported was positively associated with "habit" and "prevention" as reasons for protection and negatively associated with "not-needed" and "unprepared" as reasons for non-protection. Self-reported sun protection increased over the 14-day study period. Results of this study suggest the potential value of interventions aimed at motives for sun-protection behaviors.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansSkin NeoplasmsSunburnSunscreening AgentsText MessagingYoung AdultSunscreening AgentsDaily diaryMulti-level modelingPsychosocialSkin cancerSun protectionYoung women

Identifiers

PMID29589257
PMCPMC6031451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.