Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29589178›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2019

Anterior robotic approach in en-bloc sacrectomy: a preliminary experience.

Giacomo Corrado, Carmine Zoccali, Nicola Salducca, Andrea Oddi, Enrico Vizza, Roberto Biagini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Modified spinopelvic fixation with a novel three-dimensional-printed element following total sacrectomy for patients with sacral tumours.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Giacomo CorradoGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Health of Women and Children, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. giacomo.corrado@alice.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-6146
Carmine ZoccaliOrthopedic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-1996
Nicola SalduccaOrthopedic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7965-7096
Andrea OddiLiver and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4690-1990
Enrico VizzaGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-1202
Roberto BiaginiOrthopedic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-2841
National Cancer Institute · MYUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

En-bloc sacrectomy is a highly demanding surgical procedure necessary to obtain wide margin in sacral tumor. The double approach, anterior and posterior approach, is usually preferred for tumors extending proximally to S3 level where iliac internal vessels are at a higher risk for damage during posterior surgery. It can be justified also in selected cases to decrease the risk of posterior approach as in local recurrence or in patients who already underwent laparotomy. Our intent was to apply robotic-assisted techniques for performing anterior preparatory approach for sacrectomy surgery. Between December 2010 and December 2014, three cases of sacrectomies were performed in a previous robotic-assisted preparatory approach to separate the rectum from the tumor. Dissections were successfully performed in all cases close to the pelvic floor. The surgeon was able to position a Gore-Tex spacer between the anterior tumor surface and the rectum in all cases. The anterior dissections were performed with a perfect control of bleeding. No complications related to the anterior approach were reported. Robot-assisted surgery can be considered a valid and minimally invasive technique which allows a safe anterior dissection of the pelvic structures dividing tumors from surrounding tissues. It allows to place a spacer to protect organs during posterior sacral resection performed on the same day or at a later time. Further experiences are advocated to evaluate its efficiency in sacral tumors of greater size.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansIliac ArteryIliac VeinIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRectumRobotic Surgical ProceduresSacrococcygeal RegionSacrumSpinal NeoplasmsEn-bloc sacrectomyMinimally invasive surgeryRobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID29589178
OpenAlexW2794839860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.