Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29589076›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2018

[Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic gastric bypass : First experiences with the DaVinci system in bariatric surgery].

J H Beckmann, H Aselmann, J H Egberts, A Bernsmeier, M Laudes, T Becker, C Schafmayer, M Ahrens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J H BeckmannKlinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland. jan.beckmann@uksh.de.
H AselmannKlinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.
J H EgbertsKlinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.
A BernsmeierKlinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.
M LaudesKlinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.
T BeckerKlinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.
C SchafmayerKlinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.
M AhrensKlinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional laparoscopy is the gold standard in bariatric surgery. Internationally, robot-assisted surgery is gaining in importance. Up to now there are only few reports from Germany on the use of the system in bariatric surgery. Since January 2017 we have been performing robot-assisted gastric bypass surgery. It remains unclear whether the use of the robotic system has advantages over the well-established laparoscopic technique. Within a period from January to early August 2017 a total of 53 gastric bypass operations were performed. Of these 16 proximal redo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operations were performed with the DaVinci Si system versus 29 laparoscopic procedures. A retrospective analysis of the perioperative course was carried out. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), Edmonton obesity staging system (EOSS) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification did not show significant differences. There were also no significant differences in terms of estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, duration of surgery, postoperative inflammatory parameters and weight loss. There was no mortality and no need for revisional surgery in either group. After laparoscopic surgery there was a delayed occurrence of a leak of the gastrojejunostomy followed by readmission and endoscopic negative pressure wound therapy. The results show that the proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be performed safely and efficiently using the DaVinci surgical system. Significant differences to the conventional laparoscopic procedure were not found. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to define the role of the DaVinci system in bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidRoboticsBody Mass IndexGermanyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossDaVinciObesity surgeryPostoperative complicationsRobot assisted surgeryRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID29589076
OpenAlexW2795165662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.