ArticleBioResearch open access2018
Patient-Perceived Autonomy and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use: A Qualitative Assessment in a Midwestern, University Community.
Article in BioResearch open access, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'When they force a woman, it's to save her life': Gendered vulnerability and contraceptive coercion.Journal of critical public health · 2025Article
- Disparities in perceptions of long-acting reversible contraceptives among patients in Delaware Title X clinics.Contraception · 2025Article
- Examining the low uptake of LARC in Ethiopia: an analysis of individual-level predisposing and enabling factors.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Factors associated with never-use of long-acting reversible contraception among adult reproductive-aged women in Ohio.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2023Article
- Knowledge and Attitudes About Sterilization and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Article
- Meeting Women's Requests for Intrauterine Device and Contraceptive Implant Discontinuation: An Exploratory Survey of Physicians.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2020Article
- Perceptions of long-acting reversible contraception among women receiving medication for opioid use disorder in Vermont.Contraception · 2020Article
- Perceptions and preferences for long-acting injectable and implantable medications in comparison to short-acting medications for opioid use disorders.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2020Article
- Patient Opinions About Foreign Body Contraceptives.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Knowledge and intention to use long-acting reversible contraception among university students.Journal of American college health : J of ACHArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are the most effective contraceptives and are first-line recommendations for most women. However, young women use these methods at relatively low rates. Given concern with contraceptive coercion, an underexamined factor contributing to LARC attitudes is women's perceived reproductive and bodily autonomy in regard to LARC. We conducted focus group discussions and interviews regarding LARC perceptions and knowledge with 50 women between the ages of 18 and 29. We used a modified grounded theory approach to analyze young women's impressions of autonomy in relation to contraceptives more generally and LARC more specifically, both among ever-users and never-users. Four themes emerged regarding women's perceived autonomy with LARC. Control over pregnancy, active participation versus external agent, control over bleeding patterns, and autonomy in the provider/patient relationship. Within most themes, women made both positive and negative associations between perceived autonomy and LARC. The provider/patient relationship was a modifier of other themes, in that cooperative relationships may overshadow other perceived reductions in autonomy, and more unbalanced relationships may heighten perceived reductions in autonomy. Ever-users were more likely to report increased autonomy with LARC use, whereas never-users were more likely to express concerns about loss of autonomy with LARC. This study suggests that perceived autonomy may influence women's perceptions of LARC as well as their uptake of these contraceptive methods, with several factors both positively and negatively related to women's perceived autonomy. We encourage the integration of these findings into patient-centered counseling as well as educational materials for LARC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.