Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29588834›Full record

ReviewFrontline gastroenterology2018

Practical guidance on the use of faecal calprotectin.

Matthew J Brookes, Simon Whitehead, Daniel R Gaya, Antony Barney Hawthorne

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontline gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biotin Supplementation Ameliorates Murine Colitis by Preventing NF-κB Activation.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Testing, testing.Frontline gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J BrookesGastroenterology Department, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Simon WhiteheadDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Daniel R GayaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Antony Barney HawthorneDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiation between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and functional gut disorders, and the determination of mucosal disease activity in established cases of IBD remain the cornerstones of disease diagnosis and management. Non-invasive, accurate biomarkers of gut inflammation are needed due to the variability of symptoms, the inaccuracies of currently available blood markers and the cost and invasive nature of endoscopy. Numerous biomarkers have been used and/or considered with some in current use. This article reviews the current evidence base around the indications for using biomarkers and their limitations, with a particular focus on faecal calprotectin.

Indexed as

CROHN'S DISEASEIBDSTOOL MARKERSULCERATIVE COLITIS

Identifiers

PMID29588834
PMCPMC5868441
OpenAlexW2591075191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.