ArticleInterventional cardiology (London, England)2017
Use of Embolic Protection Devices in Peripheral Interventions.
Article in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approach to large thrombus burden in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Cerebral Hypoperfusion Caused by Brachiocephalic Artery Stenosis.EJVES vascular forum · 2025Article
- Protrieve Sheath embolic protection during venous thrombectomy: early experience in seventeen patients.CVIR endovascular · 2024Article
- Use of Wallstent device as an embolic protection device during stenting of aortic thrombus.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023Article
- Embolic Protection During Malignant Inferior Vena Caval Thrombectomy Using the Protrieve Sheath.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023Article
- Comparison and Analysis between the NAV6 Embolic Protection Filter and SpiderFX EPD Filter in Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of embolic protection devices (EPDs) when treating coronary saphenous vein bypass grafts, performing carotid arterial stenting and treating acute coronary syndromes is well accepted. We will review currently available devices and approaches to reduce distal embolisation, first discussing their uses in carotid interventions and then in vertebral and peripheral vascular interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.