Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29588656›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health systems2018

Involuntary admission in Norwegian adult psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review.

Rolf Wynn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Symptoms of the suicide crisis syndrome and associated risk factors in an acute psychiatric population, a cross-sectional study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Patients Who Die by Suicide: A Study of Treatment Patterns and Patient Safety Incidents in Norway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Factors associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in Portugal.International journal of mental health systems · 2021
    Article
  10. The role ofThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How clinicians make decisions about CTOs in ACT: a qualitative study.International journal of mental health systems · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rolf Wynn1Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2254-3343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is an important objective of the psychiatric services to keep the use of involuntary procedures to a minimum, as the use of coercion involves clinical, ethical, and legal issues. It has been claimed that Norway has a relatively high rate of involuntary admissions. We reviewed the peer-reviewed literature on the use of involuntary admission in Norway, with the purpose of identifying the current state of knowledge and areas in need of further research.

methodsA systematic review following the PRISMA statement was conducted. We searched the electronic databases PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase for studies relating to involuntary admission to Norwegian adult psychiatric hospitals published in the period 1 January 2001 to 8 August 2016. The database searches were supplemented with manual searches of relevant journals, reference lists, and websites.

resultsSeventy-four articles were included and grouped into six categories based on their main topics: Patients' experiences, satisfaction and perceived coercion (21 articles), the Referral and admission process (11 articles), Rates of admission (8 articles), Characteristics of the patients (17 articles), Staff attitudes (9 articles), and Outcomes (8 articles). Four of the included articles described intervention studies. Fifty-seven of the articles had a quantitative design, 16 had a qualitative design, and one a mixed-method design. There was a broad range of topics that were studied and considerable variation in study designs. The findings were largely in line with the international literature, but the particularities of Norwegian legislation and the Norwegian health services were reflected in the literature. The four intervention studies explored interventions for reducing rates of involuntary admission, such as modifying referring routines, improving patient information procedures, and increasing patients' say in the admission process, and represent an important avenue for future research on involuntary admission in Norway.

conclusionsThe review suggests that Norway has a relatively high rate of involuntary admissions. The identified studies represent a broad mix of topics and designs. Four intervention studies were identified. More studies with strong designs are needed to bring research on involuntary admission in Norway to a next level.

Indexed as

Civil commitmentCoercionInvoluntary admissionNorwayPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID29588656
PMCPMC5865388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.