ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2018
Continuous performance task in ADHD: Is reaction time variability a key measure?
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Differences in Ex-Gaussian Parameters from Response Time Distributions Between Individuals with and Without Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-analysis.Neuropsychology review · 2024Pooled it
- Closed-loop digital meditation for neurocognitive and behavioral development in adolescents with childhood neglect.Translational psychiatry · 2020Trial
- Characterizing Attention and Cognitive Control Profiles of Children With ADHD and Anxiety.Journal of attention disorders · 2026Article
- Comparative Effects of BCI-Based Attention Training, Methylphenidate, and Citicoline on Attention and Executive Function in School-Age Children: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Proactive Control of Emotional Information in Adult ADHD.Journal of cognition · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Sustained attention can be measured using a brief computerized attention task.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Biomarkers for Cognitive Control, Response Inhibition, Aggressivity, Impulsivity, and Violence.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- The attention network characteristics of adults with high ADHD traits: low stability, boost accuracy by sacrificing response time.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- The Effects of Quiet Eye Training on Attention in Children with ADHD.Journal of human kinetics · 2023Article
- Degrading stimuli by reducing image resolution impairs performance in a rodent continuous performance test.Behavioural processes · 2023Article
- Multimodal Virtual Reality-Based Assessment of Adult ADHD: A Feasibility Study in Healthy Subjects.Assessment · 2023Article
- Advancing ecological validity and clinical utility in virtual reality-based continuous performance test: exploring the effects of task difficulty and environmental distractors.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Alpha modulation via transcranial alternating current stimulation in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Perceptual and response factors in the gradual onset continuous performance tasks.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- A novel approach to intra-individual performance variability in ADHD.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2021Article
- Is Neurodevelopment Related to Exercise Capacity in Single Ventricle Patients Who Have Undergone Fontan Palliation?Pediatric cardiology · 2021Article
- Polysomnographic Sleep and Attentional Deficits in Traumatized North Korean Refugees.Nature and science of sleep · 2021Article
- Application of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnostic Tools: Strengths and Weaknesses of the Korean ADHD Rating Scale and Continuous Performance Test.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the use of the Continuous Performance Task (CPT) reaction time variability (intraindividual variability or standard deviation of reaction time), as a measure of vigilance in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and stimulant medication response, utilizing a simple CPT X-task vs an A-X-task.
methodComparative analyses of two separate X-task vs A-X-task data sets, and subgroup analyses of performance on and off medication were conducted.
resultsThe CPT X-task reaction time variability had a direct relationship to ADHD clinician severity ratings, unlike the CPT A-X-task. Variability in X-task performance was reduced by medication compared with the children's unmedicated performance, but this effect did not reach significance. When the coefficient of variation was applied, severity measures and medication response were significant for the X-task, but not for the A-X-task.
conclusionThe CPT-X-task is a useful clinical screening test for ADHD and medication response. In particular, reaction time variability is related to default mode interference. The A-X-task is less useful in this regard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.