Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29588576›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2018

A 4-year non-randomized comparative phase-IV study of early rheumatoid arthritis: integrative anthroposophic medicine for patients with preference against DMARDs versus conventional therapy including DMARDs for patients without preference.

Harald J Hamre, Van N Pham, Christian Kern, Rolf Rau, Jörn Klasen, Ute Schendel, Lars Gerlach, Attyla Drabik, Ludger Simon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Whole Systems Research Methods in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Harald J HamreInstitute for Applied Epistemology and Medical Methodology at the Witten/Herdecke University, Freiburg, Germany.
Van N PhamInstitute of Statistics in Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian KernDepartment of Integrative Medicine, Asklepios Westklinikum, Hamburg, Germany.
Rolf RauDepartment of Rheumatology, Evangelisches Fachkrankenhaus Ratingen, Ratingen, Germany.
Jörn KlasenDepartment of Integrative Medicine, Asklepios Westklinikum, Hamburg, Germany.
Ute SchendelDepartment of Rheumatology, m&i-Fachklinik Bad Pyrmont, Bad Pyrmont, Germany.
Lars GerlachDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Filderklinik, Filderstadt, Germany.
Attyla DrabikInstitute of Statistics in Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ludger SimonDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Filderklinik, Filderstadt, Germany.
Asklepios · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEKarl Schlecht Stiftung · DEBadr University in Cairo · EGFachklinik 360° · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are a mainstay of therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), some patients with early RA refuse DMARDs. In anthroposophic medicine (AM), a treatment strategy for early RA without DMARDs has been developed. Preliminary data suggest that RA symptoms and inflammatory markers can be reduced under AM, without DMARDs. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwo hundred and fifty-one self-selected patients aged 16-70 years, starting treatment for RA of <3 years duration, without prior DMARD therapy, participated in a prospective, non-randomized, comparative Phase IV study. C-patients were treated in clinics offering conventional therapy including DMARDs, while A-patients had chosen treatment in anthroposophic clinics, without DMARDs. Both groups received corticosteroids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Primary outcomes were intensity of RA symptoms measured by self-rating on visual analog scales, C-reactive protein, radiological progression, study withdrawals, serious adverse events (SAE), and adverse drug reactions in months 0-48.

resultsThe groups were similar in most baseline characteristics, while A-patients had longer disease duration (mean 15.1 vs 10.8 months,

conclusionStudy results suggest that for most patients preferring anthroposophic treatment, satisfactory results can be achieved without use of DMARDs and with less use of corticosteroids and NSAIDs than in conventional care. LIMITATION: Because of the non-randomized study design, with A-patients choosing anthroposophic treatment, one cannot infer how this treatment would have worked for C-patients.

Indexed as

clinical trialdisease-modifying antirheumatic drugsintegrative medicinepatient preferencePhase IVrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID29588576
PMCPMC5859899
OpenAlexW2791838718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.