Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29588483›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Genome plasticity is governed by double strand break DNA repair in Streptomyces.

Grégory Hoff, Claire Bertrand, Emilie Piotrowski, Annabelle Thibessard, Pierre Leblond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. STAGE: A compact and versatile TnpB-based genome editing toolkit forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. EditingEngineering in life sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CRISPR-aided genome engineering for secondary metabolite biosynthesis in Streptomyces.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome mining of3 Biotech · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grégory HoffUniversité de Lorraine, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Dynamique des Génomes et Adaptation Microbienne (DynAMic), UMR INRA 1128, Nancy, 54000, France.
Claire BertrandUniversité de Lorraine, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Dynamique des Génomes et Adaptation Microbienne (DynAMic), UMR INRA 1128, Nancy, 54000, France.
Emilie PiotrowskiUniversité de Lorraine, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Dynamique des Génomes et Adaptation Microbienne (DynAMic), UMR INRA 1128, Nancy, 54000, France.
Annabelle ThibessardUniversité de Lorraine, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Dynamique des Génomes et Adaptation Microbienne (DynAMic), UMR INRA 1128, Nancy, 54000, France.
Pierre LeblondUniversité de Lorraine, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Dynamique des Génomes et Adaptation Microbienne (DynAMic), UMR INRA 1128, Nancy, 54000, France. pierre.leblond@univ-lorraine.fr.
Dynamique des Génomes et Adaptation Microbienne · FRUniversité de Lorraine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The linear chromosome of the bacterium Streptomyces exhibits a remarkable genetic organization with grossly a central conserved region flanked by variable chromosomal arms. The terminal diversity co-locates with an intense DNA plasticity including the occurrence of large deletions associated to circularization and chromosomal arm exchange. These observations prompted us to assess the role of double strand break (DSB) repair in chromosome plasticity following. For that purpose, DSBs were induced along the chromosome using the meganuclease I-SceI. DSB repair in the central region of the chromosome was mutagenic at the healing site but kept intact the whole genome structure. In contrast, DSB repair in the chromosomal arms was mostly associated to the loss of the targeted chromosomal arm and extensive deletions beyond the cleavage sites. While homologous recombination occurring between copies of DNA sequences accounted for the most part of the chromosome rescue events, Non Homologous End Joining was involved in mutagenic repair as well as in huge genome rearrangements (i.e. circularization). Further, NHEJ repair was concomitant with the integration of genetic material at the healing site. We postulate that DSB repair drives genome plasticity and evolution in Streptomyces and that NHEJ may foster horizontal transfer in the environment.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairBase SequenceChromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA End-Joining RepairEvolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialMutagenesisStreptomycesDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID29588483
PMCPMC5869714
OpenAlexW2805332964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.