Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29588271›Full record

ArticleJMIR serious games2018

Development of an Exergame to Deliver a Sustained Dose of High-Intensity Training: Formative Pilot Randomized Trial.

Thomas McBain, Matthew Weston, Paul Crawshaw, Catherine Haighton, Iain Spears

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR serious games, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03477773 (Development of an Exergame to Deliver a Sustained Dose of High-Intensity Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03477773 nacompletednot on this map

Development of an Exergame to Deliver a Sustained Dose of High-Intensity Training: Formative Pilot Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSheffield Hallam UniversityRan2014 to 2015Enrolled24ConditionsMetabolic SyndromeArmsHigh-intensity exergaming
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Can Gaming Get You Fit?Frontiers in physiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas McBain *Academy of Sport and Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-9432
Matthew Weston *School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-3004
Paul Crawshaw *School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9299-4895
Catherine Haighton *Department of Social Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-0428
Iain Spears *Pro-Football Support Ltd, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4982-2841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSport science can play a critical role in reducing health inequalities. The inverse relationship between life expectancy, cardiorespiratory fitness, and socioeconomic status could be addressed by performing high-intensity training (HIT), delivered in a class salient and accessible approach. Commercially available exergames have shown encouraging compliance rates but are primarily designed for entertainment purposes rather than focusing on health-related outcomes. A serious game tailored toward delivering an exercise stimulus, while reducing the aversive protocols associated with HIT, could be beneficial to engage and improve health outcomes in socially deprived males.

objectiveThe aims of this study were to develop an exergame capable of delivering HIT and evaluate the effect on selected health outcomes in men recruited in regions of socioeconomic deprivation.

methodsWe conducted an exploratory trial in our target population, and participants were allocated to intervention (n=14) or control groups (n=10) by third-party minimization. The intervention was a 6-week training program consisting of three sessions of exergaming per week. The sessions involved a structured warm-up, then brief intermittent repetitions in the form of boxing rounds (10 s, 20 s, and 30 s) against their peers with a work/rest ratio of 0.25.

resultsRetention to the intervention was 87.5% (21/24). Over the duration of the intervention, session attendance was 67.5% (170/252); repetition mean and peak heart rates (% of maximal) and session ratings of perceived exertion (AU, arbitrary units) were 86.3 (5.4%), 89.9 (6.1%), and 7.5 (2.2 AU), respectively. The effect of the intervention, when compared with the control, was a likely small beneficial improvement in predicted maximum oxygen consumption (VO

conclusionsOver the 6-week intervention, the exergame delivered a consistent and sustained dose of HIT, with some beneficial effects on aerobic fitness in the target population.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03477773; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03477773 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6yDLgVs35).

Indexed as

boxingheart ratehigh-intensity interval trainingmetabolic syndromevideo games

Identifiers

PMID29588271
PMCPMC5893890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.