ArticleContemporary clinical trials2018
Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of home-based primary care versus usual care for high-risk homebound older adults.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of home-based primary care for homebound older adults: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Trial
- Geriatric conditions and treatment burden following diagnosis of non-muscle- invasive bladder cancer in older adults: A population-based analysis.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2021Article
- "At Home, with Care": Lessons from New York City Home-based Primary Care Practices Managing COVID-19.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
- Receipt Of Home-Based Medical Care Among Older Beneficiaries Enrolled In Fee-For-Service Medicare.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2020Article
- Paid Caregiver Communication With Homebound Older Adults, Their Families, and the Health Care Team.The Gerontologist · 2020Article
- Beyond Functional Support: The Range Of Health-Related Tasks Performed In The Home By Paid Caregivers In New York.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.