Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29587959›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2018

CUP Syndrome-Metastatic Malignancy with Unknown Primary Tumor.

Gregor Zaun, Martin Schuler, Ken Herrmann, Andrea Tannapfel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Cervical CUP syndrome].Der Radiologe · 2020
    Review
  10. [CUP in the liver].Der Pathologe · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Article
  14. Palliative Care Was not Considered.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Article
  15. p16 Examination Is not Sufficient.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregor ZaunWest German Cancer Center, Clinic for Internal Medicine (Tumor Research), University Hospital Essen; West German Cancer Center, Clinic for Internal Medicine (Tumor Research), University Hospital Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Location University Hospital Essen; West German Cancer Center, Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Location University Hospital Essen; Institute of Pathology, Ruhr-University Bochum.
Martin Schuler
Ken Herrmann
Andrea Tannapfel
Ruhr University Bochum · DEEssen University Hospital · DEWest Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background2-4% of newly diagnosed cases of malignant disease involve cancer of unknown primary (CUP). This mixed entity is one of the 6 most common types of malignant disease in Germany. Highly refined treatment strategies can now be offered to patients with CUP.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed with an emphasis on articles from the past decade. The current guidelines and recommendations of specialty societies were also considered in the evaluation.

resultsCUP most commonly manifests itself as metastases to the lymph nodes, lungs, liver, or bones. With the aid of imaging studies, including functional hybrid imaging and further medical examination, a primary tumor can be discovered in up to 40% of patients initially diagnosed with CUP. Immunohistochemistry guided by histomorphology often enables precise characterization of the lesion and can be supplemented, in selected cases, by molecular-genetic diagnostic evaluation. The most commonly detected types of primary tumor are cancers of the lung, pancreas, liver, and biliary system. For patients with local metastases, surgical resection or radiotherapy with curative intent is usually indicated, sometimes in the framework of a multimodal treatment concept. The median 2-year survival of patients with disseminated CUP is only 20%. For such patients, specific types of systemic therapy are recommended on the basis of the diagnostic characterization of the disease. Immune-modulatory antibodies can be effective, particularly in the treatment of CUP that has been characterized with biomarkers, but should still be considered experimental at present.

conclusionA combination of conventional and innovative diagnostic methods enables the provision of highly refined therapeutic strategies to patients with CUP who are undergoing treatment in interdisciplinary cancer centers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasms, Unknown Primary

Identifiers

PMID29587959
PMCPMC5881077
OpenAlexW2985625912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.