ArticleBMC research notes2018
Evaluation of two DNA extraction methods for the PCR-based detection of eukaryotic enteric pathogens in fecal samples.
Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming inconsistent DNA extraction recovery across tissue types in qPCR assays supporting biodistribution studies.Bioanalysis · 2026Article
- Comparative molecular profiling of Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic genotypic resistance in paired gastric mucosa, gastric juice, and stool samples.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- New Haplotypes of Blastocystis sp. Identified in Faeces from Various Animal Groups in Algeria.Acta parasitologica · 2024Article
- Multicenter comparative study of Enterocytozoon bieneusi DNA extraction methods from stool samples, and mechanical pretreatment protocols evaluation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of DNA quantity and quality from fecal samples of mammals transported in ethanol or lysis buffer.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Differential gut microbiome in spondyloarthritis patients associated to Blastocystis colonization.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effects of Glucosinolate-Enriched Red Radish (ACS omega · 2023Article
- Best practice for wildlife gut microbiome research: A comprehensive review of methodology for 16S rRNA gene investigations.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Decreased fecal calprotectin levels in Spondyloarthritis patients colonized by Blastocystis spp.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comparison of the Influence of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Assays on the Sensitivity ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Multicentric Evaluation of SeeGene Allplex Real-Time PCR Assays Targeting 28 Bacterial, Microsporidal and Parasitic Nucleic Acid Sequences in Human Stool Samples.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- An In Vitro Protocol to Study the Modulatory Effects of a Food or Biocompound on Human Gut Microbiome and Metabolome.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Frequency and distribution ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2021Article
- Comparison of Two Real-Time PCR Assays Targeting Ribosomal Sequences for the Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- New Developments in PCR-Based Diagnostics for Bacterial Pathogens Causing Gastrointestinal Infections-A Narrative Mini-Review on Challenges in the Tropics.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021Review
- Occurrence of Ten Protozoan Enteric Pathogens in Three Non-Human Primate Populations.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparative Study of Eleven Mechanical Pretreatment Protocols forMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Prevalence and Phylogenetic Analysis of MicrosporidiumPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multicenter Comparative Study of SixMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEfficient and easy-to-use DNA extraction and purification methods are critical in implementing PCR-based diagnosis of pathogens. In order to optimize the routine clinical laboratory diagnosis of eukaryotic enteric pathogens, we compare, via quantitative PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values, the efficiency of two DNA extraction kits: the semi-automated EZ1
resultsWhereas EZ1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.