Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29587805›Full record

Trial reportTrials2018

Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study.

Sumedha Chhatre, Ashlie Jefferson, Ratna Cook, Caitlin R Meeker, Ji Hyun Kim, Kayla Marie Hartz, Yu-Ning Wong, Adele Caruso, Diane K Newman, Knashawn H Morales and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02032550 (Treatment Preference and Patient Centered Prostate Cancer Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02032550 nacompletednot on this map

Treatment Preference and Patient Centered Prostate Cancer Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2013 to 2018Enrolled743ConditionsProstate CancerArmsPreference Based Decision Aid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person-centred randomized clinical trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sumedha ChhatreDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market St. Suite 4051, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. rasu@mail.med.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-0198
Ashlie JeffersonDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ratna CookDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Caitlin R MeekerFox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ji Hyun KimDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kayla Marie HartzEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Yu-Ning WongFox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Adele CarusoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Diane K NewmanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Knashawn H MoralesDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ravishankar JayadevappaDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute CE-12-11-4973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruitment and retention strategies for patient-centered outcomes research are evolving and research on the subject is limited. In this work, we present a conceptual model of patient-centered recruitment and retention, and describe the recruitment and retention activities and related challenges in a patient-centered comparative effectiveness trial.

methodsThis is a multicenter, longitudinal randomized controlled trial in localized prostate cancer patients.

resultsWe recruited 743 participants from three sites over 15 months period (January 2014 to March 2015), and followed them for 24 months. At site 1, of the 773 eligible participants, 551 (72%) were enrolled. At site 2, 34 participants were eligible and 23 (68%) enrolled. Of the 434 eligible participants at site 3, 169 (39%) enrolled. We observed that strategies related to the concepts of trust (e.g., physician involvement, ensuring protection of information), communication (e.g., brochures and pamphlets in physicians' offices, continued contact during regular clinic visits and calling/emailing assessment), attitude (e.g., emphasizing the altruistic value of research, positive attitude of providers and research staff), and expectations (e.g., full disclosure of study requirements and time commitment, update letters) facilitated successful patient recruitment and retention. A stakeholders' advisory board provided important input for the recruitment and retention activities. Active engagement, reminders at the offices, and personalized update letters helped retention during follow-up. Usefulness of telephone recruitment was site specific and, at one site, the time requirement for telephone recruitment was a challenge.

conclusionsWe have presented multilevel strategies for successful recruitment and retention in a clinical trial using a patient-centered approach. Our strategies were flexible to accommodate site-level requirements. These strategies as well as the challenges can aid recruitment and retention efforts of future large-scale, patient-centered research studies.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov , ID: NCT02032550 . Registered on 22 November 2013.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient SelectionAgedComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DropoutsProstatic NeoplasmsResearch SubjectsTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29587805
PMCPMC5870194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.