Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29587699›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Use of intervention mapping to adapt a health behavior change intervention for endometrial cancer survivors: the shape-up following cancer treatment program.

Dimitrios A Koutoukidis, Sonia Lopes, Lou Atkins, Helen Croker, M Tish Knobf, Anne Lanceley, Rebecca J Beeken

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02433080 (Randomised, Controlled, Pilot Clinical Trial to Assess the Feasibility of a Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Program in Endometrial Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02433080 nacompletednot on this map

Randomised, Controlled, Pilot Clinical Trial to Assess the Feasibility of a Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Program in Endometrial Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2015 to 2016Enrolled60ConditionsEndometrial NeoplasmsArmsShape-Up following cancer treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dimitrios A KoutoukidisInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sonia LopesDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lou AtkinsCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
Helen CrokerDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
M Tish KnobfSchool of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Anne LanceleyInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca J BeekenDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK. r.beeken@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 80% of endometrial cancer survivors (ECS) are overweight or obese and have sedentary behaviors. Lifestyle behavior interventions are promising for improving dietary and physical activity behaviors, but the constructs associated with their effectiveness are often inadequately reported. The aim of this study was to systematically adapt an evidence-based behavior change program to improve healthy lifestyle behaviors in ECS.

methodsFollowing a review of the literature, focus groups and interviews were conducted with ECS (n = 16). An intervention mapping protocol was used for the program adaptation, which consisted of six steps: a needs assessment, formulation of matrices of change objectives, selection of theoretical methods and practical applications, program production, adoption and implementation planning, and evaluation planning. Social Cognitive Theory and Control Theory guided the adaptation of the intervention.

resultsThe process consisted of eight 90-min group sessions focusing on shaping outcome expectations, knowledge, self-efficacy, and goals about healthy eating and physical activity. The adapted performance objectives included establishment of regular eating, balanced diet, and portion sizes, reduction in sedentary behaviors, increase in lifestyle and organized activities, formulation of a discrepancy-reducing feedback loop for all above behaviors, and trigger management. Information on managing fatigue and bowel issues unique to ECS were added.

conclusionsSystematic intervention mapping provided a framework to design a cancer survivor-centered lifestyle intervention. ECS welcomed the intervention and provided essential feedback for its adaptation. The program has been evaluated through a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorCancer SurvivorsDietEndometrial NeoplasmsEvidence-Based PracticeExerciseFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHealthy LifestyleHumansObesityOverweightBehavior changeEndometrial cancerHealthy eatingIntervention mappingPhysical activitySurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID29587699
PMCPMC5869761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.