Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29587661›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers.

Cécile Le Page, Kurosh Rahimi, Martin Köbel, Patricia N Tonin, Liliane Meunier, Lise Portelance, Monique Bernard, Brad H Nelson, Marcus Q Bernardini, John M S Bartlett and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: expert consensus report on the state of the science.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The proteome of clear cell ovarian carcinoma.The Journal of pathology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile Le PageCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kurosh RahimiCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Martin KöbelDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Patricia N ToninDepartments of Medicine and Human Genetics, McGill University; Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Liliane MeunierCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lise PortelanceCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Monique BernardCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Brad H NelsonTumour Tissue Repository, Trev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Marcus Q BernardiniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John M S BartlettDiagnostic Development and Ontario Tumour Bank, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dimcho BachvarovCentre de recherche du CHU de Quebec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Walter H GotliebLaboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Lady Davis Research Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Blake GilksDepartment of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jessica N McAlpineDepartment of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mark W NachtigalDepartment of Biochemistry & Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Alain PichéCentre de Recherche du CHUS. Département de Microbiologie et Infectiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Peter H WatsonTumour Tissue Repository, Trev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Barbara VanderhydenCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
David G HuntsmanDepartment of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Diane M ProvencherCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anne-Marie Mes-MassonCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. anne-marie.mes-masson@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-266X
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CABC Cancer Agency · CACentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CAJewish General Hospital · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Terry Fox Research Institute 2009-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian carcinoma is the most lethal gynecological malignancy due to early dissemination and acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Reliable markers that are independent and complementary to clinical parameters are needed to improve the management of patients with this disease. The Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) provides researchers with biological material and associated clinical data to conduct biomarker validation studies. Using standards defined by the Canadian Tissue Repository Network (CTRNet), we have previously demonstrated the quality of the biological material from this resource. Here we describe the clinical characteristics of the COEUR cohort.

methodsWith support from 12 Canadian ovarian cancer biobanks in Canada, we created a central retrospective cohort comprised of more than 2000 patient tissue samples with associated clinical data, including 1246 high-grade serous, 102 low-grade serous, 295 endometrioid, 259 clear cell and 89 mucinous carcinoma histotypes. A two-step reclassification process was applied to assure contemporary histological classification (histotyping). For each histotypes individually, we evaluated the association between the known clinico-pathological parameters (stage, cytoreduction, chemotherapy treatment, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation) and patient outcome by using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.

resultsThe median follow-up time of the cohort was 45 months and the 5-year survival rate for patients with high-grade serous carcinomas was 34%, in contrast to endometrioid carcinomas with 80% at 5 years. Survival profiles differed by histotype when stratified by stage or cytoreduction. Women with mucinous or clear cell carcinomas at advanced stage or with non-optimally debulked disease had the worst outcomes. In high-grade serous carcinoma, we observed significant association with longer survival in women harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation as compared to patients without detectable mutation.

conclusionsOur results show the expected survival rates, as compared with current literature, in each histotype suggesting that the cohort is an unbiased representation of the five major histotypes. COEUR, a one stop comprehensive biorepository, has collected mature outcome data and relevant clinical data in a comprehensive manner allowing stratified analysis.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAgedBiological Specimen BanksCanadaCohort StudiesFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerBRCAEpithelial ovarian cancerHistotypeSurvivalTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID29587661
PMCPMC5872529
OpenAlexW2794460351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.