Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29587658›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

De-medicalization of birth by reducing the use of oxytocin for augmentation among first-time mothers - a prospective intervention study.

L C Gaudernack, K F Frøslie, T M Michelsen, N Voldner, M Lukasse

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Oxytocin augmentation and neurotransmitters in prolonged delivery: An experimental appraisal.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Oxytocin Administration in Low-Risk Women, a Retrospective Analysis of Birth and Neonatal Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Relation between Length of Exposure to Epidural Analgesia during Labour and Birth Mode.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L C GaudernackDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital / Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway. lisegaudernack@yahoo.no.
K F FrøslieNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Women's Health, Oslo, Norway.
T M MichelsenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Rikshospitalet and National Advisory Unit on Women's Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
N VoldnerFaculty of Health Studies, VID Scientific International Diaconal Specialized University Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
M LukasseFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOOslo University Hospital · NOVID Specialized University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of synthetic oxytocin for augmentation of labor is rapidly increasing worldwide. Hyper-stimulation is the most significant side effect, which may cause fetal distress and operative delivery. We performed an intervention consisting of an educational program and modified guidelines to achieve a more appropriate use of oxytocin.

methodsThis prospective intervention study included 431 first-time mothers at term with spontaneous onset of labor before (October 2012 to May 2013), and 664 after the intervention (April 2014 to April 2015). Our outcomes were prevalence and duration of oxytocin treatment, mode of delivery, indication for operative delivery, episiotomy, anal sphincter tears, bleeding, labor duration, pain relief and the effect of oxytocin on mode of delivery.

resultsAfter the intervention, 52.9% were diagnosed with dystocia, compared with 68.9% before (p < 0.001). Oxytocin was not always used in accordance with the guidelines, but a significant reduction in oxytocin rates from 63.3% to 54.1% (p < 0.001) was obtained. More women without dystocia according to the existing guidelines were augmented after the intervention (18.9% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001). Assessing all labors, the median duration of oxytocin treatment was reduced by 72% (from 90 to 25 min) without increasing the median duration of labor (385 min in both groups). There was a moderate reduction in operative vaginal deliveries from 26.9 to 21.5% (p = 0.04), and dystocia as an indication for these deliveries increased (p = 0.01). There was a moderate increase in caesarean sections from 6.7 to 10.2% (p = 0.05), but no increase in dystocia as an indication for these deliveries. Women receiving oxytocin were more likely to have an operative vaginal birth, even after adjusting for birth weight, epidural analgesia and labor duration, OR: 2.1 (CI 1.1-4.0) before and OR 2.7 (CI 1.6-4.5) after the intervention.

conclusionsOur intervention led to a significant reduction in the use of oxytocin. However, more than half of the women remained diagnosed with dystocia. Operative vaginal births seem to be associated with oxytocin treatment. Therefore, augmentation with oxytocin should be used with caution and only when medically indicated. Even more modified guidelines for augmentation than the ones applied in this study might be appropriate.

Indexed as

MedicalizationAdultDelivery, ObstetricDystociaEpisiotomyFemaleHumansLabor, ObstetricMidwiferyOxytocicsOxytocinParturitionPregnancyProspective StudiesOxytocicsOxytocinDe-medicalizationFirst-time mothersLabor durationOperative vaginal deliveryOxytocin augmentation

Identifiers

PMID29587658
PMCPMC5870510
OpenAlexW2807140362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.