Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29584926›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2019

Evaluation of Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches Among US Veterans with Musculoskeletal Pain Using Propensity Score Methods.

Ling Han, Joseph L Goulet, Melissa Skanderson, Harini Bathulapalli, Stephen L Luther, Robert D Kerns, Cynthia A Brandt

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ling HanDepartments of *Internal Medicine.
Joseph L GouletPsychiatry.
Melissa SkandersonPain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
Harini BathulapalliPain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
Stephen L LutherCINDRR, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Robert D KernsPsychiatry.
Cynthia A BrandtPsychiatry.
VA Connecticut Healthcare System · USYale University · USJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Pain Care Quality and Integrated and Complementary Health ApproachesR01AT008448 · NCCIH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BRANDT, CYNTHIA A., KERNS, ROBERT D · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008448NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the treatment effectiveness of complementary and integrative health approaches (CIH) on chronic pain using Propensity Score (PS) methods. Design, Settings, and Participants: A retrospective cohort of 309,277 veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain assessed over three years after initial diagnosis. Methods: CIH exposure was defined as one or more clinical visits for massage, acupuncture, or chiropractic care. The treatment effect of CIH on self-rated pain intensity was examined using a longitudinal model. PS-matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to account for potential selection and confounding biases. Results: At baseline, veterans with (7,621) and without (301,656) CIH exposure differed significantly in 21 out of 35 covariates. During the follow-up period, on average CIH recipients had 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77 to 0.89) points higher pain intensity ratings (range = 0-10) than nonrecipients. This apparent unfavorable effect size was reduced to 0.37 (95% CI = 0.28 to 0.45) after PS matching, 0.36 (95% CI = 0.29 to 0.44) with IPTW on the treated (IPTW-T) weighting, and diminished to null when integrating IPTW-T with PS matching (0.004, 95% CI = -0.09 to 0.10). An alternative IPTW model and conventional covariate adjustment appeared least powerful in terms of potential bias reduction. Sensitivity analyses restricting the follow-up period to one year after CIH initiation derived consistent results. Conclusions: PS-based causal methods successfully eliminated baseline difference between exposure groups in all measured covariates, yet they did not detect a significant difference in the self-rated pain intensity outcome between veterans who received CIHs and those who did not during the follow-up period.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreTreatment OutcomeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainComplementary TherapiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID29584926
PMCPMC6329442
OpenAlexW2790534133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.