Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29584866›Full record

Observational studyThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2018

Levels of Serum Brain-Derived Neurotropic Factor in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis-Findings from the Longitudinal Youth at Risk Study (LYRIKS).

Jie Yin Yee, Tih-Shih Lee, Jimmy Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Stress, Environment and Early Psychosis.Current neuropharmacology · 2024
    Review
  5. Pivotal mental states.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie Yin YeeResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Tih-Shih LeeNeuroscience & Behavioural Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Jimmy LeeResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School · SGInstitute of Mental Health · SGNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying biomarkers to enrich prognostication and risk predictions in individuals at high risk of developing psychosis will enable stratified early intervention efforts. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor has been widely studied in schizophrenia and in first-episode psychosis with promising results. The aim of this study was to examine the levels of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor between healthy controls and individuals with ultra-high risk of psychosis.

methodsA sample of 106 healthy controls and 105 ultra-high risk of psychosis individuals from the Longitudinal Youth at Risk Study was included in this study. Ultra-high risk of psychosis status was determined using the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental State at recruitment. Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia was used to assess the severity of depression. All participants were followed up for 2 years, and ultra-high risk of psychosis remitters were defined by ultra-high risk of psychosis individuals who no longer fulfilled Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental State criteria at the end of the study period. Levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor were measured in the serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.

resultsThe ultra-high risk of psychosis group had significantly higher baseline levels of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor compared with the control group (3.7 vs 3.3 ng/mL, P=.018). However, baseline levels of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor did not predict the development of psychosis (OR=0.64, CI=0.40-1.02) or remission (OR=0.83, CI=0.60-1.15) from ultra-high risk of psychosis status.

conclusionFindings from our study did not support a role for serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in predicting outcomes in ultra-high risk of psychosis individuals. However, the finding of higher levels of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in ultra-high risk of psychosis individuals deserves further study.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsBiomarkersBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePrognosisProspective StudiesPsychotic DisordersRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultBDNF protein, humanBiomarkersBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factorbrain-derived neurotrophic factorperipheral markersultra-high risk of psychosis

Identifiers

PMID29584866
PMCPMC6070044
OpenAlexW2791564041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.