Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29584861›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

Linezolid pharmacokinetics in MDR-TB: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation.

James Millard, Henry Pertinez, Laura Bonnett, Eva Maria Hodel, Véronique Dartois, John L Johnson, Maxine Caws, Simon Tiberi, Mathieu Bolhuis, Jan-Willem C Alffenaar and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00396084 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Randomized, Open Label, Multiple Dose Phase I Study of the Early Bactericidal Activity of Linezolid, Gatifloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin in HIV-non-infected Adults With Initial Episodes of Sputum Smear-Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2004 to 2007Enrolled70ConditionsTuberculosisArmsGatifloxacin, Isoniazid, Levofloxacin, Linezolid, Moxifloxacin
NCT06590428 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Linezolid in the Treatment of Rifampin-resistant Tuberculosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2026 to 2029Enrolled280ConditionsRifampin-resistant Tuberculosis, Drug-resistant TuberculosisArmsTherapeutic Drug Monitoring for Linezolid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Adult Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2022
    Review
  12. Pharmacologic Management ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Mycobacterium tuberculosis sterilizing activity of faropenem, pyrazinamide and linezolid combination and failure to shorten the therapy duration.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

James MillardWellcome Trust Liverpool Glasgow Centre for Global Health Research, Liverpool, UK.
Henry PertinezDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Laura BonnettInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Eva Maria HodelDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Véronique DartoisPublic Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
John L JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Maxine CawsLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Simon TiberiDepartment of Infection, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK.
Mathieu BolhuisDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Willem C AlffenaarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Geraint DaviesInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Derek J SloanInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105620/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 203919/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The oxazolidinone linezolid is an effective component of drug-resistant TB treatment, but its use is limited by toxicity and the optimum dose is uncertain. Current strategies are not informed by clinical pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) data; we aimed to address this gap. Methods: We defined linezolid PK/PD targets for efficacy (fAUC0-24:MIC >119 mg/L/h) and safety (fCmin <1.38 mg/L). We extracted individual-level linezolid PK data from existing studies on TB patients and performed meta-analysis, producing summary estimates of fAUC0-24 and fCmin for published doses. Combining these with a published MIC distribution, we performed Monte Carlo simulations of target attainment. Results: The efficacy target was attained in all simulated individuals at 300 mg q12h and 600 mg q12h, but only 20.7% missed the safety target at 300 mg q12h versus 98.5% at 600 mg q12h. Although suggesting 300 mg q12h should be used preferentially, these data were reliant on a single centre. Efficacy and safety targets were missed by 41.0% and 24.2%, respectively, at 300 mg q24h and by 44.6% and 27.5%, respectively, at 600 mg q24h. However, the confounding effect of between-study heterogeneity on target attainment for q24h regimens was considerable. Conclusions: Linezolid dosing at 300 mg q12h may retain the efficacy of the 600 mg q12h licensed dosing with improved safety. Data to evaluate commonly used 300 mg q24h and 600 mg q24h doses are limited. Comprehensive, prospectively obtained PK/PD data for linezolid doses in drug-resistant TB treatment are required.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHumansLinezolidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonte Carlo MethodMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAnti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolid

Identifiers

PMID29584861
PMCPMC6005026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.