Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29584777›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Aqueous two-phase system to isolate extracellular vesicles from urine for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Hyunwoo Shin, Yong Hyun Park, Yong-Goo Kim, Ji Youl Lee, Jaesung Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extracellular vesicles as tools and targets in therapy for diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  5. The Landscape of Exosomes Biogenesis to Clinical Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Updated Methods of Extracellular Vesicles Isolation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Principles and Problems of Exosome Isolation from Biological Fluids.Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement. Series A, Membrane and cell biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyunwoo ShinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang, Republic of Korea.
Yong Hyun ParkDepartment of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Goo KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Youl LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaesung ParkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5082-3318
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRPohang University of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing extracellular vesicles (EVs) is an attractive approach to diagnosis of prostate diagnosis. However, existing methods of EVs isolation have low efficiency, purity, and long process time, and therefore have low diagnostic ability. To solve these the problems, a two-phase system is adapted to isolate EVs from a patient's urine. Urine from 20 prostate cancer (PCA) patients and 10 benign prostate hyperplasia patients was used to quantify the EVs-isolation ability of an aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) and to compare the diagnostic ability of ATPS with that of the conventional diagnosis method. An optimized ATPS isolates EVs with ~100% efficiency within ~30 min, with 14 times as high as achieved by ultracentrifugation. Afterward, PCR and ELISA are used to detect EVs derived from PCA cells in urine. The results demonstrate that diagnostic ability based on ATPS is better than other conventional diagnostic methods. ATPS can obtain a high quality and quantity of EVs from patients' urine. EVs contain cancer-related protein and genes, so these abundant sources enable diagnosis with high specificity and sensitivity. Therefore, ATPS is a useful tool to increase the specificity and sensitivity of diagnosis.

Indexed as

Chemical PrecipitationArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorDextransEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayExtracellular VesiclesHumansHyperplasiaMaleMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNanoparticlesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymerase Chain ReactionProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRNABiomarkers, TumorDextransPolyethylene GlycolsProstate-Specific AntigenRNAWater

Identifiers

PMID29584777
PMCPMC5870972
OpenAlexW2794463786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.