Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29584757›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Transcriptome analysis of genetically matched human induced pluripotent stem cells disomic or trisomic for chromosome 21.

Patrick K Gonzales, Christine M Roberts, Virginia Fonte, Connor Jacobsen, Gretchen H Stein, Christopher D Link

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Down syndrome and type I interferon: not so simple.Current opinion in immunology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Consequences of aneuploidy in human fibroblasts with trisomy 21.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick K GonzalesLinda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Christine M RobertsLinda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Virginia FonteLinda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Connor JacobsenDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Gretchen H SteinLinda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Christopher D LinkLinda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2271-7697
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trisomy of chromosome 21, the genetic cause of Down syndrome, has the potential to alter expression of genes on chromosome 21, as well as other locations throughout the genome. These transcriptome changes are likely to underlie the Down syndrome clinical phenotypes. We have employed RNA-seq to undertake an in-depth analysis of transcriptome changes resulting from trisomy of chromosome 21, using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from a single individual with Down syndrome. These cells were originally derived by Li et al, who genetically targeted chromosome 21 in trisomic iPSCs, allowing selection of disomic sibling iPSC clones. Analyses were conducted on trisomic/disomic cell pairs maintained as iPSCs or differentiated into cortical neuronal cultures. In addition to characterization of gene expression levels, we have also investigated patterns of RNA adenosine-to-inosine editing, alternative splicing, and repetitive element expression, aspects of the transcriptome that have not been significantly characterized in the context of Down syndrome. We identified significant changes in transcript accumulation associated with chromosome 21 trisomy, as well as changes in alternative splicing and repetitive element transcripts. Unexpectedly, the trisomic iPSCs we characterized expressed higher levels of neuronal transcripts than control disomic iPSCs, and readily differentiated into cortical neurons, in contrast to another reported study. Comparison of our transcriptome data with similar studies of trisomic iPSCs suggests that trisomy of chromosome 21 may not intrinsically limit neuronal differentiation, but instead may interfere with the maintenance of pluripotency.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingCell DifferentiationCell LineChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Down SyndromeGene Expression ProfilingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeuronsRNA EditingSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeTrisomy

Identifiers

PMID29584757
PMCPMC5870938
OpenAlexW2949064102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.