Trial reportPloS one2018
Patient and physician characteristics affect adherence to screening mammography: A population-based cohort study.
Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review: Association Between Physicians' Clinical Experience and Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetologia · 2020Pooled it
- Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines according to obesity status: a French cross-sectional multicenter survey.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic position and breast cancer screening use in Chile: A population-based study.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Do women with a history of breast cancer recommend risk-based breast cancer screening? An in-depth interview study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Temporal Evolution and Associated Factors of Adherence to Mammography Screening among Women in Spain: Results from Two National Health Surveys (2017-2020).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Link between the referring physician and breast and cervical cancers screening: a cross-sectional study in France.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Sociodemographic Determinants in Breast Cancer Screening among Uninsured Women of West Texas.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Adherence to Follow-up Testing Recommendations in US Veterans Screened for Lung Cancer, 2015-2019.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Relationship of attitudes toward uncertainty and preventive health behaviors with breast cancer screening participation.BMC women's health · 2021Article
- Effect of comorbid mood and anxiety disorders on breast and cervical cancer screening in immune-mediated inflammatory disease.PloS one · 2021Article
- Exploring factors associated with breast cancer screening among women aged 15-49 years in Lesotho.The Pan African medical journal · 2021Article
- Patients Are Knowledge Workers in the Clinical Information Space.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Coverage determinants of breast cancer screening in Flanders: an evaluation of the past decade.International journal for equity in health · 2020Article
- The association between social media use for health related information and compliance with breast and cervical cancer screenings.Research reports (Montgomery) · 2020Article
- Determinants of Compliance to Breast Cancer Screening and Referral in Low Socio-Economic Regions of Urban India.International journal of preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Determinants of Breast Cancer Screening Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Cohort at Increased Inherited Cancer Risk in the United States.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScreening mammograms are widely recommended biennially for women between the ages of 50 and 74. Despite the benefits of screening mammograms, full adherence to recommendations falls below 75% in most developed countries. Many studies have identified individual (obesity, smoking, socio-economic status, and co-morbid conditions) and primary-care physician parameters (physician age, gender, clinic size and cost) that influence adherence, but little data exists from large population studies regarding the interaction of these individual factors.
methodsWe performed a historical cohort study of 44,318 Israeli women age 56-74 using data captured from electronic medical records of a large Israeli health maintenance organization. Univariate analysis was used to examine the association between each factor and adherence (none, partial or full) with screening recommendations between 2008-2014. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the significance of these factors in combination, using binary and multinomial logistic regression.
resultsAmong 44,318 women, 42%, 43% and 15% were fully, partially and non-adherent to screening recommendations, respectively. Factors associated with inferior adherence identified in our population included: smoking, obesity, low body weight, low socio-economic status, depression, diabetes mellitus and infrequent physician visits, while, women with ischemic heart disease, female physicians, physicians between the ages of 40 and 60, and medium-sized clinics were associated with higher screening rates. Most factors remained significant in the multivariate analysis.
conclusionsBoth individual and primary-care physician factors contribute to adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Strategies to improve adherence and address disparities in mammography utilization will need to address these factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.