Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29584741›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Genome-wide analysis of codon usage bias in four sequenced cotton species.

Liyuan Wang, Huixian Xing, Yanchao Yuan, Xianlin Wang, Muhammad Saeed, Jincai Tao, Wei Feng, Guihua Zhang, Xianliang Song, Xuezhen Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Codon Usage Bias of the Polyphenol Oxidase Genes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liyuan WangState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2975-4423
Huixian XingState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.
Yanchao YuanState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.
Xianlin WangState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.
Muhammad SaeedDepartment of Botany, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Jincai TaoState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.
Wei FengState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.
Guihua ZhangHeze Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Heze, China.
Xianliang SongState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.
Xuezhen SunState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Codon usage bias (CUB) is an important evolutionary feature in a genome which provides important information for studying organism evolution, gene function and exogenous gene expression. The CUB and its shaping factors in the nuclear genomes of four sequenced cotton species, G. arboreum (A2), G. raimondii (D5), G. hirsutum (AD1) and G. barbadense (AD2) were analyzed in the present study. The effective number of codons (ENC) analysis showed the CUB was weak in these four species and the four subgenomes of the two tetraploids. Codon composition analysis revealed these four species preferred to use pyrimidine-rich codons more frequently than purine-rich codons. Correlation analysis indicated that the base content at the third position of codons affect the degree of codon preference. PR2-bias plot and ENC-plot analyses revealed that the CUB patterns in these genomes and subgenomes were influenced by combined effects of translational selection, directional mutation and other factors. The translational selection (P2) analysis results, together with the non-significant correlation between GC12 and GC3, further revealed that translational selection played the dominant role over mutation pressure in the codon usage bias. Through relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) analysis, we detected 25 high frequency codons preferred to end with T or A, and 31 low frequency codons inclined to end with C or G in these four species and four subgenomes. Finally, 19 to 26 optimal codons with 19 common ones were determined for each species and subgenomes, which preferred to end with A or T. We concluded that the codon usage bias was weak and the translation selection was the main shaping factor in nuclear genes of these four cotton genomes and four subgenomes.

Indexed as

CodonGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGossypiumSpecies SpecificityCodon

Identifiers

PMID29584741
PMCPMC5870960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.