ArticlePLoS medicine2018
Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary care in mild to moderate chronic kidney disease in the United States: A modeling study.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- When Tech Meets Touch: Multistakeholder Perspectives and Implementation Strategies for eHealth in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review Using Computational Linguistics.Journal of nursing management · 2026Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary care for patients with chronic kidney disease in Japan.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of a prognostic risk assessment for early-stage 1-3b diabetic kidney disease patients in the United States.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Risk Stratification in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease in the US Veterans Population.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Association of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Slopes with Cardiorenal Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease before and after Multidisciplinary Education.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2026Article
- CKD-Associated Pruritus: A Patient-Centered Approach to Reduce Symptom Burden.Kidney medicine · 2025Review
- Fast and robust invariant generalized linear models.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2025Article
- Impact of a CKD Population Health Intervention on Healthcare Utilization and Costs.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Population Health Management Impact on Healthcare Utilization and Costs in CKD: Post Hoc Analysis of the Kidney Coordinated HeAlth Management Partnership Trial.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Critical Review of the Benefit from Early Pharmacological and Dietary Support for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe (Non-Terminal) Chronic Kidney Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease in Mexico, a Case for Policy Transfer.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Examining chronic kidney disease screening frequency among diabetics: a POMDP approach.Health care management science · 2024Article
- Economic Evaluation of an Integrated Care Program Compared to Conventional Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in Rural Communities of Thailand.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- Variation in outcomes and practice patterns among patients with localized pancreatic cancer: the impact of the pancreatic cancer multidisciplinary clinic.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- VA-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Program Feasibility Considerations and Process Outline.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023Article
- Implementing a Formalized Risk-Based Approach to Determine Candidacy for Multidisciplinary CKD Care: A Descriptive Cohort Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2023Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nefecon versus Best Supportive Care for People with Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) in the United States.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2023Article
- Article
- Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Renal Failure in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin for Non-diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultidisciplinary care (MDC) programs have been proposed as a way to alleviate the cost and morbidity associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the US. METHODS AND
findingsWe assessed the cost-effectiveness of a theoretical Medicare-based MDC program for CKD compared to usual CKD care in Medicare beneficiaries with stage 3 and 4 CKD between 45 and 84 years old in the US. The program used nephrologists, advanced practitioners, educators, dieticians, and social workers. From Medicare claims and published literature, we developed a novel deterministic Markov model for CKD progression and calibrated it to long-term risks of mortality and progression to end-stage renal disease. We then used the model to project accrued discounted costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over patients' remaining lifetime. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of MDC, or the cost of the intervention per QALY gained. MDC added 0.23 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.42) QALYs over usual care, costing $51,285 per QALY gained (net monetary benefit of $23,100 at a threshold of $150,000 per QALY gained; 95% CI: $6,252, $44,323). In all subpopulations analyzed, ICERs ranged from $42,663 to $72,432 per QALY gained. MDC was generally more cost-effective in patients with higher urine albumin excretion. Although ICERs were higher in younger patients, MDC could yield greater improvements in health in younger than older patients. MDC remained cost-effective when we decreased its effectiveness to 25% of the base case or increased the cost 5-fold. The program costed less than $70,000 per QALY in 95% of probabilistic sensitivity analyses and less than $87,500 per QALY in 99% of analyses. Limitations of our study include its theoretical nature and being less generalizable to populations at low risk for progression to ESRD. We did not study the potential impact of MDC on hospitalization (cardiovascular or other).
conclusionsOur model estimates that a Medicare-funded MDC program could reduce the need for dialysis, prolong life expectancy, and meet conventional cost-effectiveness thresholds in middle-aged to elderly patients with mild to moderate CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.