Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29584719›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Dynamic cues for whisker-based object localization: An analytical solution to vibration during active whisker touch.

Roman Vaxenburg, Isis Wyche, Karel Svoboda, Alexander L Efros, Samuel Andrew Hires

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A dynamical model for generating synthetic data to quantify active tactile sensing behavior in the rat.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Whisker Vibrations and the Activity of Trigeminal Primary Afferents in Response to Airflow.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roman VaxenburgComputational Materials Science Center, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America.
Isis WycheSection of Neurobiology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of South California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Karel SvobodaJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Alexander L EfrosCenter for Computational Material Science, Code 6390, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Samuel Andrew HiresSection of Neurobiology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of South California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3498-0388

Funding

New approaches to understanding sensorimotor learning and perceptionDP2NS105554 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HIRES, SAMUEL ANDREW · 2017 to 2017
$2.5M
Cortical circuit mechanisms of sensorimotor object localizationR01NS102808 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HIRES, SAMUEL ANDREW · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NIH HHS 1DP2NS105554-01NIH HHS R01NS102808NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS105554NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrations are important cues for tactile perception across species. Whisker-based sensation in mice is a powerful model system for investigating mechanisms of tactile perception. However, the role vibration plays in whisker-based sensation remains unsettled, in part due to difficulties in modeling the vibration of whiskers. Here, we develop an analytical approach to calculate the vibrations of whiskers striking objects. We use this approach to quantify vibration forces during active whisker touch at a range of locations along the whisker. The frequency and amplitude of vibrations evoked by contact are strongly dependent on the position of contact along the whisker. The magnitude of vibrational shear force and bending moment is comparable to quasi-static forces. The fundamental vibration frequencies are in a detectable range for mechanoreceptor properties and below the maximum spike rates of primary sensory afferents. These results suggest two dynamic cues exist that rodents can use for object localization: vibration frequency and comparison of vibrational to quasi-static force magnitude. These complement the use of quasi-static force angle as a distance cue, particularly for touches close to the follicle, where whiskers are stiff and force angles hardly change during touch. Our approach also provides a general solution to calculation of whisker vibrations in other sensing tasks.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationMechanoreceptorsMiceNeuronsPhysical StimulationTouchTouch PerceptionVibrationVibrissae

Identifiers

PMID29584719
PMCPMC5889188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.