ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Computational Simulation Studies on the Binding Selectivity of 1-(1H-Benzimidazol-5-yl)-5-aminopyrazoles in Complexes with FGFR1 and FGFR4.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cutting-edge developments in computer-aided anti-HIV drug design.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of 5',7-Disubstituted 7-Deaza-adenosine Analogues as Irreversible Pan-FGFR Inhibitors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Laser-Induced Dimeric Photoproducts of Chlorpromazine: LC-MS Identification and Molecular Docking Evidence of Enhanced Anticancer Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Elucidating the potential effects of point mutations on FGFR3 inhibitor resistance via combined molecular dynamics simulation and community network analysis.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2023Article
- Glioma-Targeted Therapeutics: Computer-Aided Drug Design Prospective.The protein journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) has become a potential target for the treatment of cancer. Designing FGFR1-selective inhibitors remains fundamental to the development of anti-cancer drugs because of highly sequential homology among FGFR subtypes. In present work, four inhibitors were examined with intermolecular interaction patterns with FGFR1 and FGFR4, respectively, for the exploration of binding mechanisms by applying a combined approach of computational techniques, including flexible docking, binding site analyses, electronic structure computations, molecular dynamic simulations, and binding free energy predictions. Molecular simulation-predicted binding conformations and pharmacophoric features of these molecules in the active pocket of either FGFR1 or FGFR4. MMPB(GB)SA-calculated binding free energies were accordant with the ordering of their tested potency values. Furthermore, in silico mutations of two residues (FGFR1: Tyr563 and Ser565) were also performed to check their impact on ligand binding by applying MD simulations and binding free energy calculations. The present studies may provide a structural understanding of the FGFR1-selective mechanism. The viewpoints from computational simulations would be valuable guidelines for the development of novel FGFR1-selective inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.