How Should Biobanks Prioritize and Diversify Biosample Collections? A 40-Year Scientific Publication Trend Analysis by the Type of Biosample.

Biobanks are infrastructures for large-scale biology innovation. Governance of biobanks can be usefully informed by studies of publication trends, for example, on the types of biosamples employed in scientific publications. We examined trends in each of the serum, plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC), buffy coat, tissue, and gut microbiome biosample-related scientific publications over the past 40 years, using data between 1977 and 2016 from the Scopus database. We found that the number of tissue-related publications was the highest in each year of our analysis than other biosamples, but was generally less than the sum of serum- and plasma-related publications. Importantly, the microbiome publications increased greatly starting in the 2010s, and currently overtook the number of publications on PBMC and buffy coat. Among serum-, plasma-, and tissue-related publications, the number of protein- and RNA-related publications was generally higher than cell-free DNA-, DNA-, and metabolite-related publications for the past 40 years. Mass spectrometry- and next-generation sequencing-related publications have increased dramatically since the 2000s and 2010s, respectively. Microbiome- and metabolite-related biosamples can help diversify future biosample collections, while tissue collections appear to maintain their importance in scientific publications. We also report here our observations on the countries that use biosample research (e.g., China, United Kingdom, United States, and others). These publication trends by the type of biosamples illuminate roadmaps by which biobanks might establish and diversify their biosample collections in the future. In addition, we note that biobanks need to secure biosamples appropriate for integrated analysis of multi-omics research data.