Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29583062›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2018

Process Evaluation for Improving K12 Program Effectiveness: Case Study of a National Institutes of Health Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health Research Career Development Program.

Nancy C Raymond, Jean F Wyman, Satlaj Dighe, Eileen M Harwood, Mikow Hang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nancy C Raymond1 Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin , Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Jean F Wyman2 Center for Aging Science and Care Innovation, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Satlaj Dighe3 Department of Organizational Leadership, Policy, and Development, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Eileen M Harwood4 Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Mikow Hang5 Program in Health Disparities Research, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Funding

Univ of Minnesota Buidling Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD055887 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ALLEN, SHARON S, BERGE, JERICA M · 2007 to 2023
$8.6M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProcess evaluation is an important tool in quality improvement efforts. This article illustrates how a systematic and continuous evaluation process can be used to improve the quality of faculty career development programs by using the University of Minnesota's Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH) K12 program as an exemplar.

methodsData from a rigorous process evaluation incorporating quantitative and qualitative measurements were analyzed and reviewed by the BIRCWH program leadership on a regular basis.

resultsExamples are provided of how this evaluation model and processes were used to improve many aspects of the program, thereby improving scholar, mentor, and advisory committee members' satisfaction and scholar outcomes.

conclusionsA rigorous evaluation plan can increase the effectiveness and impact of a research career development plan.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceInterdisciplinary ResearchWomen's HealthAcademic Medical CentersCapacity BuildingFacultyFemaleHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationLeadershipMentoringMentorsMinnesotaNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Organizational InnovationProgram EvaluationK12 training grantOffice of Research in Women's Healthprogram evaluationresearch career advancementwomen's health research training

Identifiers

PMID29583062
PMCPMC6007805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.