Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29582581›Full record

ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2019

Mentalization-based treatment or psychodynamic treatment programmes for patients with borderline personality disorder - the impact of clinical severity.

Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein, Geir Pedersen, Espen Folmo, Øyvind Urnes, Merete Selsbakk Johansen, Benjamin Hummelen, Theresa Wilberg, Sigmund Karterud

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Personality disorders: the impact of severity on societal costs.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pedagogical stance in mentalization-based treatment.Journal of clinical psychology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Case formulations in mentalization-based group therapy.Research in psychotherapy (Milano) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elfrida Hartveit KvarsteinSection for Personality Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-4249
Geir PedersenSection for Personality Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Espen FolmoSection for Personality Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Øyvind UrnesSection for Personality Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Merete Selsbakk JohansenSection for Personality Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Benjamin HummelenDepartment of Research and Development, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Theresa WilbergSection for Personality Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Sigmund KarterudSection for Personality Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMentalization-based treatment (MBT), originally designed for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), may be particularly indicated for severe conditions. However, there is limited documentation of how increasing severity of personality disorder (PD) effect outcomes of highly specialized treatments. This study aimed to investigate associations between clinical severity and outcomes for patients in MBT as compared to a psychodynamic group-based treatment programme (PDT).

designA naturalistic, longitudinal, comparison study.

methodsThe sample included 345 patients with BPD (PDTn = 281, MBTn = 64). The number of diagnosed PDs, PD criteria, and symptom disorders were chosen as baseline indicators of clinical severity. Clinical outcomes (global functioning, symptom distress, interpersonal problems) were repeatedly assessed over three years. Therapists' fidelity to MBT was satisfactory. Linear mixed models were the applied statistics.

resultsIn PDT, greater clinical severity was associated with poorer improvement rates. Clinical severity was not associated with significant differences in outcomes for patients in MBT. Differences in outcomes for patients in MBT and PDT increased significantly with higher severity of disorder.

conclusionsSupporting previous research, this study indicates that clinical benefits associated with MBT also apply for BPD patients with severe conditions. The results also suggest that increasing severity was a challenge in PDT. PRACTITIONER POINTS: MBT may be particularly beneficial for severely disordered BPD patients Differences between MBT and PDT were less pronounced in moderately disordered BPD patients.

Indexed as

Theory of MindAdultBorderline Personality DisorderFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotherapyPsychotherapy, GroupTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultborderline PDclinical severityMentalization-based treatment

Identifiers

PMID29582581
PMCPMC6585931
OpenAlexW2795183246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.