ArticleClinical cardiology2018
Sleep study-guided multidisciplinary therapy (SGMT) for patients with acute coronary syndrome: Trial rationale and design.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sleep study-guided multidisciplinary therapy (SGMT) for patients with acute coronary syndrome: Trial rationale and design.Clinical cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an emerging risk marker for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This randomized trial aims to determine the effects of sleep study-guided multidisciplinary therapy (SGMT) comprising overnight sleep study, continuous positive airway pressure, and behavioral therapy for OSA during the subacute phase of ACS. We hypothesize that SGMT will reduce (1) the plasma levels of N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide and suppression of tumorigenicity 2; (2) the estimated 10-year risk of cardiovascular mortality as measured by the European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) algorithm; and (3) the cardiovascular event rate during a 3-year follow-up, compared with standard therapy. In the SGMT trial, 180 patients presenting with ACS will be randomly assigned to SGMT (n = 90) and standard therapy (n = 90) groups. Both groups will receive guideline-mandated treatment for ACS. Those assigned to SGMT will additionally undergo a sleep study and, if OSA is diagnosed, attend a multidisciplinary OSA clinic where they will receive personalized treatment including continuous positive airway pressure and behavioral/lifestyle counseling. The primary endpoint is the plasma N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide concentration at 7-month follow-up. This report presents the baseline characteristics of 117 patients (SGMT group: n =54; standard therapy group: n =63) who had been enrolled into the study as of August 31, 2017. The results of this trial will help us to understand whether active OSA diagnosis and treatment will improve the physiologic and clinical cardiovascular outcomes of this group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.