Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29582346›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2019

Breast screening in symptomatic women over 35 years of age: improvements in service efficiency.

Roisin M O'Cearbhaill, Sandra Hembrecht, Liam A Devane, Jane Rothwell, Denis Evoy, James Geraghty, Damian P McCartan, Sorcha McNally, Ann O'Doherty, Enda W McDermott and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roisin M O'CearbhaillDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. roisinocearbhaill@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-6441
Sandra HembrechtDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Liam A DevaneDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Jane RothwellDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Denis EvoyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
James GeraghtyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Damian P McCartanDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Sorcha McNallyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Ann O'DohertyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Enda W McDermottDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Ruth S PrichardDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe rationalization of cancer services in Ireland saw all women with symptomatic breast problems referred to one of the eight regional cancer centers. A pilot triaging system was introduced in St Vincent's University Hospital to streamline these services. Women over 35 years who do not meet urgent referral criteria are referred for a mammogram prior to a clinic appointment ("image first"). The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine the recall rates, biopsy rates, and rate of breast cancer identification within this cohort of patients. This was compared to a screening population of patients.

methodsPatients triaged into the "image first" group within a one-year period were identified. Results of the initial mammogram, further imaging and subsequent biopsies were recorded. Data relating to number of recalls, number of patients biopsied and number of cancers identified within the Merrion Unit of the National Breastcheck Screening Program was obtained for comparison.

resultsOne thousand six hundred eighty-eight referrals were triaged as "image first" over this period. 185 (11%) of patients required a biopsy of an identified lesion. Breast cancer was diagnosed in 65 patients (3.9%). During the same study period, of the 42,099 women who were screened for breast cancer, 496 (1.8%) underwent biopsy and 267 (0.63%) were diagnosed with breast cancer.

conclusionImage first patients, who represent a cohort of "symptomatic" non-urgent women, have a greater rate of breast cancer detection than an asymptomatic screening population. This may have an impact on the appropriate triaging of symptomatic women in a national cancer center.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsyBreastBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIrelandMammographyRetrospective StudiesSymptom AssessmentTriageBreast cancerMammographyScreeningSymptomatic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.